2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20102930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Adaptive Beamforming with Optimal Covariance Matrix Estimation in the Presence of Gain-Phase Errors

Abstract: An adaptive beamformer is sensitive to model mismatch, especially when the desired signal exists in the training samples. Focusing on the problem, this paper proposed a novel adaptive beamformer based on the interference-plus-noise covariance (INC) matrix reconstruction method, which is robust with gain-phase errors for uniform or sparse linear array. In this beamformer, the INC matrix is reconstructed by the estimated steering vector (SV) and the corresponding individual powers of the interference signals, as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the adaptive approaches employed to combat mainbeam deceptive jamming in [6,8,9,11,12] are extremely susceptible to signal SV mismatches induced by observed direction error [14], array geometry error [15], channel gain and phase uncertainty [16], and incoherent local scattering [17]. Furthermore, when the training sample is contaminated by the desired signal, the aforementioned jamming suppression techniques will suffer performance degradation, resulting in the "self-cancellation" of the desired signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adaptive approaches employed to combat mainbeam deceptive jamming in [6,8,9,11,12] are extremely susceptible to signal SV mismatches induced by observed direction error [14], array geometry error [15], channel gain and phase uncertainty [16], and incoherent local scattering [17]. Furthermore, when the training sample is contaminated by the desired signal, the aforementioned jamming suppression techniques will suffer performance degradation, resulting in the "self-cancellation" of the desired signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new weighting design method is proposed in reference [34] to suppress the deceptive interference by using the range dimension degrees of freedom of the FDA to control the location distribution of the zero notches. However, the beamforming anti-jamming methods in [19,29,30,33,34] are easily affected by the signal mismatch caused by incoherent scattering [35], array error [36], direction error [37], and channel gain [38]. For non-uniformly spaced FDA radars, Ge [39] proposed a phase-centric cognitive adaptive anti-interference method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%