2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mporth.2021.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic total hip arthroplasty: past, present and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaining an in-depth understanding of the necessary parameters to evaluate spinopelvic mobility and recognising the individual patterns of imbalance and ramifications is vital for the arthroplasty surgeon. Robotic arm–assisted THA offers a pragmatic and reproducible way to achieve the desired implant orientation, in addition to offset and leg length [ 32 ]—all very important surgical targets especially in the subset of patients with spinopelvic imbalance. Furthermore, the introduction of the latest software allowing virtual ROM is a valuable tool in the surgical armamentarium, providing real-time pre-operative and intra-operative feedback regarding ROM and the presence of impingement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaining an in-depth understanding of the necessary parameters to evaluate spinopelvic mobility and recognising the individual patterns of imbalance and ramifications is vital for the arthroplasty surgeon. Robotic arm–assisted THA offers a pragmatic and reproducible way to achieve the desired implant orientation, in addition to offset and leg length [ 32 ]—all very important surgical targets especially in the subset of patients with spinopelvic imbalance. Furthermore, the introduction of the latest software allowing virtual ROM is a valuable tool in the surgical armamentarium, providing real-time pre-operative and intra-operative feedback regarding ROM and the presence of impingement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opinion of the authors of this review is that in the future, studies and reviews should focus on making a discrete distinction between active and semi-active robotic assistance, addressing technology matureness, and considering surgeon experience. Clear limitations of RO THA include the additional radiation exposure and associated hazards and the high costs related to the installation, computer software, pre-operative imaging, operational costs, surgical team training, learning curves, and the limited amount of compatible implants [19,20]. However, it has been suggested that additional costs could be balanced by the reduced length of stay, fewer complications, and longer implant survivorship [21,22].…”
Section: B Semiactive Robotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-assisted navigation and robotics have been increasingly used in THA; compared with manual methods, these tools can improve reproducibility of component positioning and provide quantitative intraoperative information on leg length and offset [7,62]. For platforms that use preoperative 3-dimensional imaging, impingement modeling further allows for optimization of implant positioning based on patient factors [31]. This information, combined with the ability to precisely position implants, has the potential to improve implant longevity with enhanced restoration of hip mechanics as well as decreased edge loading, soft tissue irritation from prominent hardware, bony and implant impingement, and instability [31].…”
Section: Computer Navigation and Robotics In Thamentioning
confidence: 99%