2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Surgical Simulation versus Traditional Didactics for Surgical Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: openAccessArticle: Falsecover date: 2015-03-01pii: S1553-4650(14)01616-1Harvest Date: 2016-01-06 13:08:26issueName: Abstracts of the 41st Annual SGS Scientific MeetingPage Range: S8-S8href scidir: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465014016161pubType: Oral Presentation 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a randomized controlled trial presented at the 41st Annual SGS Scientific Meeting comparing traditional didactics versus simulation. Participants in the didactic group scored 84% on post‐training assessment compared to the simulation group who scored 72% . Both groups reported that they felt that neither didactics nor simulation alone would be sufficient for robotics training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a randomized controlled trial presented at the 41st Annual SGS Scientific Meeting comparing traditional didactics versus simulation. Participants in the didactic group scored 84% on post‐training assessment compared to the simulation group who scored 72% . Both groups reported that they felt that neither didactics nor simulation alone would be sufficient for robotics training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%