2015
DOI: 10.1109/mts.2015.2425813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Prosthetics : Moving Beyond Technical Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that supplementary feedback can increase awareness of applied force, body awareness, and grip accuracy while at the same time decrease visual dependency and mental effort, specially for the blind and/or double amputee. 19…”
Section: Background and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that supplementary feedback can increase awareness of applied force, body awareness, and grip accuracy while at the same time decrease visual dependency and mental effort, specially for the blind and/or double amputee. 19…”
Section: Background and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While May et al [19] found that adults generally accept robots and are comfortable around robots, Jarrasse et al [20] found that clinicians are regularly confronted with users who prefer mechanical cable-based devices or aesthetic limbs (i.e., systems that do not dynamically adjust) over more complex myoelectric active prosthetics. They postulate that this occurs since many socioanthropological and cultural phenomena that may influence human-device interaction are not considered during the design and training process (e.g., the need for instant integration, the potential for new interaction modalities, and loss of versatility in task-specific devices).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%