Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic or Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: Pros and Cons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 179 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 9 ] For expert renal surgeons, the LC of RAPN appears to be < 30 cases to attain similar proficiency. [ 10 ] Low-volume surgeon (<7 cases/year) had a comparable complication rate (18.1% vs. 15.9% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.81) as high-volume (15–30 cases/year) and very high-volume (>30 cases/year) surgeons. [ 11 ] Even for a complex procedure such as RARC, an acceptable level of proficiency is reached after 21–30 cases (benchmark OT of <6.5 h; lymph node yield of 20 and <5% positive surgical margin).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 ] For expert renal surgeons, the LC of RAPN appears to be < 30 cases to attain similar proficiency. [ 10 ] Low-volume surgeon (<7 cases/year) had a comparable complication rate (18.1% vs. 15.9% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.81) as high-volume (15–30 cases/year) and very high-volume (>30 cases/year) surgeons. [ 11 ] Even for a complex procedure such as RARC, an acceptable level of proficiency is reached after 21–30 cases (benchmark OT of <6.5 h; lymph node yield of 20 and <5% positive surgical margin).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%