2011
DOI: 10.4031/mtsj.45.4.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Models for Studying Undulatory Locomotion in Fishes

Abstract: A B S T R A C TMany fish swim using body undulations to generate thrust and maneuver in three dimensions. The pattern of body bending during steady rectilinear locomotion has similar general characteristics in many fishes and involves a wave of increasing amplitude passing from the head region toward the tail. While great progress has been made in understanding the mechanics of undulatory propulsion in fishes, the inability to control and precisely alter individual parameters such as oscillation frequency, bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has previously been shown that different modes of undulatory locomotion can generally be correlated with different body shapes 50 , and the relationship between swimming performance and body form has been examined using both empirical and numerical methods 38,39 . However, the morphology of the asymmetric tail fin in mosasaurs falls between the two categories previously examined 38,39 , and no numerical studies of hypocercal (or epicercal) performance in various kinematic regimes are available, although a recent investigation of tail form employing passive robotic swimmers did include epicercal variants in the form of foils with an angled trailing edge 51 . These epicercal foils yielded higher velocities for any given tail beat frequency, but were found to be less efficient in terms of power requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been shown that different modes of undulatory locomotion can generally be correlated with different body shapes 50 , and the relationship between swimming performance and body form has been examined using both empirical and numerical methods 38,39 . However, the morphology of the asymmetric tail fin in mosasaurs falls between the two categories previously examined 38,39 , and no numerical studies of hypocercal (or epicercal) performance in various kinematic regimes are available, although a recent investigation of tail form employing passive robotic swimmers did include epicercal variants in the form of foils with an angled trailing edge 51 . These epicercal foils yielded higher velocities for any given tail beat frequency, but were found to be less efficient in terms of power requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most of the rayfinned fishes, the caudal fin does not move only in two dimensions: under the control of the intrinsic musculature, the fin rays actively move as the fish swims, forming a complex three-dimensional (3D) propulsive surface [22][23][24][25]. Earlier studies on caudal fin active deformation investigated the hydrodynamic effects of different motion patterns and fin ray stiffness at a constant flow speed and found that this kind of three-dimensional motion may contribute to the fish's manoeuvrability [13,[26][27]. However, although the musculature of the caudal fin is seperate from the posterior axial body musculature, bony fishes are able to control the caudal peduncle and the fin surface simultaneously, so the three-dimensional caudal fin motion should not be considered separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2001, bio-inspired undulating fin models [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] have been developed to investigate the undulation principles of knifefish. The aforementioned inconsistency does exist and has prevented robotic fish models from replicating the locomotion or behaviours of their biological counterparts.…”
Section: Control Problem Of Reproducing Animal Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%