2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12213-009-0019-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic micromanipulation for microassembly: modelling by sequencial function chart and achievement by multiple scale visual servoings

Abstract: The paper investigates robotic assembly by focusing on the manipulation of microparts. This task is formalized through the notion of basic tasks which are organized in a logical sequence represented by a function chart and interpreted as the model of the behavior of the experimental setup. The latter includes a robotic system, a gripping system, an imaging system, and a clean environment. The imaging system is a photon videomicroscope able to work at multiple scales. It is modelled by a linear projective model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous solutions are possible: designing environmental isolation platforms [17] [18], considering noise limitation during the design of micromanipulation systems by an appropriate choice of the resonance frequency of end effectors [19], or using appropriate controllers for noise rejection [20]. Multi-noise isolation platforms are generally very expansive and have a limited volume which can be a real problem if a micromanipulation station requires a large working space [21]. Moreover, vibration isolation tables commonly found in typical microrobotics laboratories allow efficient ground noise filetring but fail to filter acoustic noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous solutions are possible: designing environmental isolation platforms [17] [18], considering noise limitation during the design of micromanipulation systems by an appropriate choice of the resonance frequency of end effectors [19], or using appropriate controllers for noise rejection [20]. Multi-noise isolation platforms are generally very expansive and have a limited volume which can be a real problem if a micromanipulation station requires a large working space [21]. Moreover, vibration isolation tables commonly found in typical microrobotics laboratories allow efficient ground noise filetring but fail to filter acoustic noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A matching algorithm was applied in [43], based on shape recognition for micro-assembly, allowing stability, high recognition efficiency (97% in 58.6 ms in average), and accurate positioning (93% in 20.1 ms in average) of the components. In [44], a sequential function chart was implemented in order to achieve automated procedures for micro-assembly, obtaining relatively more complex microassemblies by the system introduced lately by the same authors in [45]. This last work introduces a vision feedback strategy based on a real-time visual tracking algorithm used by the association of 2D features taken from images and their correspondence in the CAD model for the automation of assembly.…”
Section: Autonomous Systems For Assembly Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. designed a visual servo feedback controller for a novel large working range microassembly manipulation system, and used the Fourier descriptors to identify and recognize the gripping fingers and object according to the silver wire rod for position information [69]. Brahim Tamadazte [70,71] from the FEMTO-ST Institute in France established a micromanipulation system as shown in Figure 6a (1). The system is placed on an anti-vibration platform to keep it in a controlled environment.…”
Section: Microscopic Visual Servoing Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%