Robotic Lymphadenectomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy with First Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection

Abstract

Background. An expert consensus meeting had defined the standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatoduodenectomy for an adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. There is a controversy regarding the possibility to perform this optimal lymphadenectomy by minimally invasive approach. Patients. The patient was a 68-year-old man with the diagnosis of an adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. The 3D reconstructions evidenced the existence of a right hepatic artery. Technique. The patient was positioned in the French position with the assistant between the legs and the robot at the head. Five trocars were used; the camera was introduced through the umbilicus trocar. The operation began with a peritoneal and liver exploration, and with an interaortico-caval picking. Because lymph nodes were noninvaded, pancreatoduodenectomy was decided with the first dissection of the superior mesenteric artery helped with a hanging maneuver. The right hepatic artery was dissected.Each structure of the hepatic pedicle was skeletonized. The camera was switched to the right side. The first jejunal loop was divided with a stapler. The specimen was totally mobilized en bloc, freed from the portal vascular axis with a dissection of the right border of the coeliac trunk. The pancreas was divided. At the end of the dissection, the different arterial and venous structures were skeletonized with a resection of the lymph node group 5-6-8 a -12 a,b,c -13 a,b -14 a,b -17 a,b . Pathology confirmed R0 resection for a well-differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma graded pT3N1 (5/20). Conclusions. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy could be performed with an optimal standard lymphadenectomy as recommended by the expert consensus.DISCLOSURE The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

Laparoscopic management of neuroendocrine tumors: state-of-the-art

“…Many studies in the literature have recently confirmed the possibility of performing a safe and feasible minimally invasive treatment of hepatobiliary cancer (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). This review confirms the possibility of performing laparoscopic resection for PNETs.…”

Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?

“…However, we strongly believe that the robot, with increasing surgical experience and skills, future perspectives integrating technology such as augmented reality, fluorescence, image fusion (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), could be the way to reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, which could simultaneously reduce the overall costs of hospital stay. This major evaluation, combined with the enhanced possibility to perform even more complex and oncological operations in robotic surgery (13,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33), could well account for a substantial spread towards the diffusion of robotic pancreatic surgery. Further studies should be completed to assess the role of robotic surgery as compared to other approaches, in order to understand the real benefit for patients as well as the medical and economic impacts of this approach on health economics.…”

Real robotic total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) assisted by hanging manoeuver (HM): Standardised technique

“…This manoeuver has also been described in the resection of tumours of the uncinate process. However, at the moment, few articles have been published regarding HM by robotic approach 32 …”

“…After that, many variations of the technique have been described. 13,[30][31][32] With the aim of performing mesopancreas resection and improving R0 rates, pancreatic HM has been described as useful and safe. 30,31,33 That manoeuver allows for total vascular control and complete mesopancreas excision.…”