Abstract:An experimental studio on a highway site in Canton of Ticino in Switzerland held at the ETH in the fall of 2017 is the result of a collaborative project with the National Center of Competence in Research Digital Fabrication, ETH Zürich. The work shows a series of designs that were developed through procedural and robotic principles. The landscape models based on a Lidar point cloud data set of the entire Ticino Valley served as the basis of all terrain operations. The results obtained after a 15-week studio ar… Show more
“…The first project represents a large, almost architectural scale; the second represents an architectural site ground; and the third simulates the construction of architectural or landscape elements. This expands the current pedagogical aspects researched in the "Robotic Landscapes" studio, which focus on a single site and exploration scale in the laboratory setting [3] (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018). The possibility to work iteratively, across scales, using the same setup and similar tools is indicative of what is proposed here as the collapse of scale.…”
Section: The Collapse Of Scalementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Determinacy, thus, needs to be replaced by an iterative form of design sensitivity, allowing the terrain and its particular features to shape the parametric design approach for the robotic handling of earthen materials (Bar-Sinai et al, 2019). While current architectural pedagogy addresses unpredictable soil dynamics, onsite testing conducted by an autonomous excavator and integration of both aspects in the design process (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018), there is still a need for structured iterative protocols which factor in the uncertainty and reduce it throughout the process.…”
Section: The Experimental Dimension Of Knowledge In Digital Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The "Robotic Landscapes" studio employed a single scale of laboratory exploration, while largerscale testing was performed onsite through direct terrain manipulation using an autonomous robotic tool (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018).…”
Section: Arch 143mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These encourage a return to the use of native, onsite soil with robotic tools (Perrot et al, 2018). Finally, the value of workmanship is gaining renewed relevance in the context of digital design as a way to re-establish traditional crafts using robotic tools (Golsteijn et al, 2014;Tanti and Mostafavi, 2014;Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018;Shaked and Dubin, 2019).…”
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to advance remote robotic fabrication through an iterative and pedagogical protocol for shaping architectural grounds. Advancements in autonomous robotic tools enable to reach increasingly larger scales of architectural and landscape construction and operate in remote and inaccessible sites. In parallel, the relation of architecture to its environment is significantly reconsidered, as the building industry's contribution to the environmental stress increases. In response, new practices emerge, addressing the reshaping and modulation of environments using digital tools. The context of extra-terrestrial architecture provides a ground for exploring these issues, as future practice in this domain relies on the use of remote autonomous means for repurposing local matter. As a result, the novelty in robotic construction laboratories is tied to innovation in architectural pedagogy.Design/methodology/approachThis paper puts forth a pedagogical protocol and iterative framework for digital groundscaping using robotic tools. The framework is demonstrated through an intensive workshop led by the authors. To situate the discussion, digital groundscaping is linked to several conditions that characterize practice and relate to pedagogy. These conditions include the experimental dimension of knowledge in digital fabrication, the convergence of knowledge as part of the blur between the fields of architecture and landscape architecture and the bridging of heterogeneous knowledge sets (virtual and physical), which robotic fabrication on natural terrains entails.FindingsThe outcomes of the workshop indicate that iterative processes can assist in applying autonomous design protocols on remote grounds. The protocols were assessed in light of the roles of technological tools, design iterations and material agency in the robotic fabrication.Originality/valueThe paper concludes with observations linking the iterative protocol to new avenues in architectural pedagogy as means of advancing the capacity to digitally design, modulate and transform natural grounds.
“…The first project represents a large, almost architectural scale; the second represents an architectural site ground; and the third simulates the construction of architectural or landscape elements. This expands the current pedagogical aspects researched in the "Robotic Landscapes" studio, which focus on a single site and exploration scale in the laboratory setting [3] (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018). The possibility to work iteratively, across scales, using the same setup and similar tools is indicative of what is proposed here as the collapse of scale.…”
Section: The Collapse Of Scalementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Determinacy, thus, needs to be replaced by an iterative form of design sensitivity, allowing the terrain and its particular features to shape the parametric design approach for the robotic handling of earthen materials (Bar-Sinai et al, 2019). While current architectural pedagogy addresses unpredictable soil dynamics, onsite testing conducted by an autonomous excavator and integration of both aspects in the design process (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018), there is still a need for structured iterative protocols which factor in the uncertainty and reduce it throughout the process.…”
Section: The Experimental Dimension Of Knowledge In Digital Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The "Robotic Landscapes" studio employed a single scale of laboratory exploration, while largerscale testing was performed onsite through direct terrain manipulation using an autonomous robotic tool (Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018).…”
Section: Arch 143mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These encourage a return to the use of native, onsite soil with robotic tools (Perrot et al, 2018). Finally, the value of workmanship is gaining renewed relevance in the context of digital design as a way to re-establish traditional crafts using robotic tools (Golsteijn et al, 2014;Tanti and Mostafavi, 2014;Girot and Hurkxkens, 2018;Shaked and Dubin, 2019).…”
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to advance remote robotic fabrication through an iterative and pedagogical protocol for shaping architectural grounds. Advancements in autonomous robotic tools enable to reach increasingly larger scales of architectural and landscape construction and operate in remote and inaccessible sites. In parallel, the relation of architecture to its environment is significantly reconsidered, as the building industry's contribution to the environmental stress increases. In response, new practices emerge, addressing the reshaping and modulation of environments using digital tools. The context of extra-terrestrial architecture provides a ground for exploring these issues, as future practice in this domain relies on the use of remote autonomous means for repurposing local matter. As a result, the novelty in robotic construction laboratories is tied to innovation in architectural pedagogy.Design/methodology/approachThis paper puts forth a pedagogical protocol and iterative framework for digital groundscaping using robotic tools. The framework is demonstrated through an intensive workshop led by the authors. To situate the discussion, digital groundscaping is linked to several conditions that characterize practice and relate to pedagogy. These conditions include the experimental dimension of knowledge in digital fabrication, the convergence of knowledge as part of the blur between the fields of architecture and landscape architecture and the bridging of heterogeneous knowledge sets (virtual and physical), which robotic fabrication on natural terrains entails.FindingsThe outcomes of the workshop indicate that iterative processes can assist in applying autonomous design protocols on remote grounds. The protocols were assessed in light of the roles of technological tools, design iterations and material agency in the robotic fabrication.Originality/valueThe paper concludes with observations linking the iterative protocol to new avenues in architectural pedagogy as means of advancing the capacity to digitally design, modulate and transform natural grounds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.