2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Intracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder: Replicating Open Surgical Principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
84
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(CD≥III: 16%) and 61.8% (CD≥III: 11.8%) and 90-day complication rate of 68% (CD≥III: 21%) and 82.4% (CD≥III: 20.6%) for ileal conduit and continent diversion respectively is consistent with that described by the Pasadena Consensus [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In their cumulative analysis, the Pasadena Consensus reported a 30-day complication rate of 42%-86% for intracorporeal ileal conduit and 43%-62% for intracorporeal continent diversion while the 90-day complication rate for intracorporeal ileal conduit was 30%-77% and the data for complications of 90-day continent diversion was not reported [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…(CD≥III: 16%) and 61.8% (CD≥III: 11.8%) and 90-day complication rate of 68% (CD≥III: 21%) and 82.4% (CD≥III: 20.6%) for ileal conduit and continent diversion respectively is consistent with that described by the Pasadena Consensus [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In their cumulative analysis, the Pasadena Consensus reported a 30-day complication rate of 42%-86% for intracorporeal ileal conduit and 43%-62% for intracorporeal continent diversion while the 90-day complication rate for intracorporeal ileal conduit was 30%-77% and the data for complications of 90-day continent diversion was not reported [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Exceptions included prospective studies [8,22,28,35,36,43,52,59,64,66,81,87] and some multi-institutional retrospective collaboration studies [16,23,25,30,45,48,54,61,68]. Only two of the comparative studies were randomized [74,83] (LOE 2b); all other comparative studies were nonrandomized, whether prospective or retrospective (LOE 4).…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the surgical series were retrospective, single-center studies, with the exception of some prospective studies [8,9,29,32,33,48,62,63,67,69,71,73,77] and some multi-institutional collaboration papers [19,24,26,30,38,39,43,45,72] (LOE 4). Only three of the comparative studies were randomized [78][79][80] (LOE 2b); all other comparative studies were nonrandomized, whether prospective or retrospective (LOE 4).…”
Section: Quality Of the Studies And Level Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%