The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0001062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Inspection of Underground Utilities for Construction Survey Using a Ground Penetrating Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulations, both for the sensitivity tests and the forward modelling, were performed exploiting gprMax , version 3.1.6 (Warren et al., 2016), which is an open‐source software designed to simulate the propagation of an EM wave even in heterogenous media, by solving Maxwell's equations in 3‐D using the finite‐difference time‐domain method. The algorithm can handle complex geometries and materials distributions, being highly adaptable to model a wide range of subsurface scenarios in various fields of application, such as archaeology, civil engineering, glaciology, and hydrogeology, among others (e.g., Cheng et al., 2023; Feng et al., 2023; Haruzi et al., 2022; Hillebrand et al., 2021; Pajewski et al., 2017; Schennen et al., 2022). In order to reduce the computational costs due to model discretization, we exploited a specific module for gprMax modelling on GPU (Warren et al., 2018) and performed the inversion on Cineca Marconi 100 cluster with 2 CPUs with 16 cores 3.1 GHz, 4 NVIDIA Volta V100 16GB GPUs and 256 GB RAM per node running on GPUs and parallelized on several nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations, both for the sensitivity tests and the forward modelling, were performed exploiting gprMax , version 3.1.6 (Warren et al., 2016), which is an open‐source software designed to simulate the propagation of an EM wave even in heterogenous media, by solving Maxwell's equations in 3‐D using the finite‐difference time‐domain method. The algorithm can handle complex geometries and materials distributions, being highly adaptable to model a wide range of subsurface scenarios in various fields of application, such as archaeology, civil engineering, glaciology, and hydrogeology, among others (e.g., Cheng et al., 2023; Feng et al., 2023; Haruzi et al., 2022; Hillebrand et al., 2021; Pajewski et al., 2017; Schennen et al., 2022). In order to reduce the computational costs due to model discretization, we exploited a specific module for gprMax modelling on GPU (Warren et al., 2018) and performed the inversion on Cineca Marconi 100 cluster with 2 CPUs with 16 cores 3.1 GHz, 4 NVIDIA Volta V100 16GB GPUs and 256 GB RAM per node running on GPUs and parallelized on several nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet another approach employing deep neural network architectures 44 has been used to acquire permittivity inversion of geometrical configurations of buried objects. In addition to this methodology, subsurface pipes have been detected and localized on GPR image with deep learning based back projection algorithm 45 and subsurface targets with different shapes could be reconstructed with deep learning networks 46 , 47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%