2017
DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2017.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review

Abstract: How to cite this article: Lai ECH, Chung DTM, Chan OCY, Tang CN. Robotic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review. Hepatoma Res 2017;3:278-83.The robotic surgical system was developed to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. The use of robots in liver surgery was not well evaluated. This article aimed at reviewing robotic partial hepatectomy to conventional laparoscopic or open partial hepatectomy in terms of perioperative, oncologic, and healthcare costs for hepat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a number of technological advancements, including greater visibility, increased angulation and range of motion, and more precise suturing, robotic surgical systems are better than laparoscopic devices [20][21][22][23][24]. Robotic surgical systems are now employed in a wide range of operations and specialties, such as head and neck surgery, urology, endocrine surgery, metabolic and bariatric surgery, and all intra-abdominal surgery subspecialties [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a number of technological advancements, including greater visibility, increased angulation and range of motion, and more precise suturing, robotic surgical systems are better than laparoscopic devices [20][21][22][23][24]. Robotic surgical systems are now employed in a wide range of operations and specialties, such as head and neck surgery, urology, endocrine surgery, metabolic and bariatric surgery, and all intra-abdominal surgery subspecialties [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%