2022
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2021.3101358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Exploration for Learning Human Motion Patterns

Abstract: Understanding how people are likely to move is key to efficient and safe robot navigation in human environments. However, mobile robots can only observe a fraction of the environment at a time, while the activity patterns of people may also change at different times. This paper introduces a new methodology for mobile robot exploration to maximise the knowledge of human activity patterns by deciding where and when to collect observations. We introduce an exploration policy driven by the entropy levels in a spat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent years, another work tackling the problem of spatio-temporal exploration was published by Molina et al (2021). In this paper, the authors explore the problem of gathering observations for time-dependent flow map STeFMap (Molina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Task Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years, another work tackling the problem of spatio-temporal exploration was published by Molina et al (2021). In this paper, the authors explore the problem of gathering observations for time-dependent flow map STeFMap (Molina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Task Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where larger values indicate less accurate prediction compared with the test data. These two metrics can be regarded as the standard metrics when comparing human activity or flow models [3], [6], [16], [27]. However, these criteria have limited expressiveness in terms of the usefulness of the model e.g.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metrics and Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…χ 2 -distance is given as multipliers of 10 4 for brevity of notation. 27. 2.34 32.03 2.57 35.75 2.77 38.89 1.79 456.92 1.94 460.32 1.84 477.26 2.0 481.37 Fr-AAM 2.6 33.72 2.38 30.76 2.61 33.89 2.67 34.89 1.36 345.00 1.31 438.58 1.32 420.39 1.28 429.97 GP-Hom 2.58 31.35 2.34 33.49 2.56 33.60 2.32 34.74 1.57 649.01 1.5 639.74 1.41 567.46 1.37 576.19 CoPA-Map 2.61 50.52 2.13 24.91 2.33 25.28 2.19 25.20 1.44 606.58 0.82 172.07 0.8 164.56 0.69 127.15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Office Dataset [27]: The second dataset contains tracks of people based on measurements by a single stationary 3D-Lidar in an office environment of the University of Lincoln, England, covering an area of ca. 85 m 2 with averagely about 300 entries per square meter and day.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…χ 2 -distance is given as multipliers of 10 4 for brevity of notation. 27. 2.34 32.03 2.57 35.75 2.77 38.89 1.79 456.92 1.94 460.32 1.84 477.26 2.0 481.37 Fr-AAM 2.6 33.72 2.38 30.76 2.61 33.89 2.67 34.89 1.36 345.00 1.31 438.58 1.32 420.39 1.28 429.97 GP-Hom 2.58 31.35 2.34 33.49 2.56 33.60 2.32 34.74 1.57 649.01 1.5 639.74 1.41 567.46 1.37 576.19 CoPA-Map 2.61 50.52 2.13 24.91 2.33 25.28 2.19 25.20 1.44 606.58 0.82 172.07 0.8 164.56 0.69 127.15Copyright (c) 2022 IEEE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%