Robotic Central Bisectionectomy for Centrally Located Hepatic Malignant Tumor

Rojas, Aram; Paterakos, Pierce; Choi, Sung Hoon

doi:10.1245/s10434-022-11646-6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study reported a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma which involved segments 4 and 8 to undergo robotic central bisectionectomy. The outcomes indicated that robotic central bisectionectomy could be performed safely using proper exposure techniques and an appropriate combination of several useful technical tips[ 16 ]. A multicenter study reported that robotic right posterior sectionectomy could be performed in expert centers with less blood loss and lower conversion rates in well-selected patients[ 93 , 94 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the advent of advanced technique and with experience accumulation, the indications of RLR have been expanded. The robotic system can be used in almost all types of liver resection, including minor hepatectomy, major hepatectomy, donor hepatectomy, and complex liver resections[ 9 - 16 ]. In 2018, an international consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy provided recommendations for RLR based on relevant research and experts’ opinions, which contribute to standardization of robotic hepatectomy[ 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023

Liu,

Hilal,

Wakabayashi

et al. 2023

World J Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts’ opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%