2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5836562
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Background Undoubtedly, robotic systems have largely penetrated the surgical field. For any new operative approach to become an accepted alternative to conventional methods, it must be proved safe and result in comparable outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term operative as well as oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal cancer resections. MethodsThis is a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with rectal cancer undergoing either robotic-ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the number of HLNs, when omitting the study from Kim et al, the heterogeneity was greatly declined ( I 2 = 10%, P = .35), and the result was not affected (MD: −0.34, 95% CI, −1.37 to 0.70, P = 53), and the study from Kim et al might be the source of heterogeneity for the data on the number of HLNs. In regard to proximal margin, when omitting the study from Debakey et al, the remaining studies were no heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0, P = .80), and the result was not influenced (MD = 0.76, 95% CI, −0.71 to 2.23, P = .31), and the study from Debakey et al might be the source of heterogeneity for the data on the proximal margin. The source of heterogeneity for the data on the DDM could not be determined using the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the number of HLNs, when omitting the study from Kim et al, the heterogeneity was greatly declined ( I 2 = 10%, P = .35), and the result was not affected (MD: −0.34, 95% CI, −1.37 to 0.70, P = 53), and the study from Kim et al might be the source of heterogeneity for the data on the number of HLNs. In regard to proximal margin, when omitting the study from Debakey et al, the remaining studies were no heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0, P = .80), and the result was not influenced (MD = 0.76, 95% CI, −0.71 to 2.23, P = .31), and the study from Debakey et al might be the source of heterogeneity for the data on the proximal margin. The source of heterogeneity for the data on the DDM could not be determined using the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By screening the titles and abstracts, 484 studies were rejected. A full‐text evaluation helped identify seven studies that met the inclusion criteria . The publication year ranged from 2008 to 2018.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations