Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer

Robotic Surgery: A Solution in Search of a Problem—A Bayesian Analysis of 343 Robotic Procedures Performed by a Single Surgical Team

“…Other authors report the removal of 17.5 nodes, 63 18 nodes, 64 and 25.9 nodes. 65 These results are comparable to our average of 22.23 nodes (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). 50,61 Most of the authors recommend the use of minimal surgery in cervical cancer stages IA2-IB2, until a maximum of IIA.…”

Robotic Surgery: A Solution in Search of a Problem—A Bayesian Analysis of 343 Robotic Procedures Performed by a Single Surgical Team

“…Other authors report the removal of 17.5 nodes, 63 18 nodes, 64 and 25.9 nodes. 65 These results are comparable to our average of 22.23 nodes (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). 50,61 Most of the authors recommend the use of minimal surgery in cervical cancer stages IA2-IB2, until a maximum of IIA.…”

The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial

“…Currently, tumor location, patient characteristics, surgical indication, and complexity are crucial factors when clinicians are deciding on a surgical approach. 6,15,16 Our results showed that the risk of severe morbidity related to the tumor site (cervix vs endometrium) was significant in the univariate analysis, but no longer significant in the multivariable model. We observed no significant interaction between surgery method and tumor site.…”

How does a surgeon’s brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot

“…Under these experimental conditions, and with the aid of a high density recording system, any observed stimulus – dependent change in interhemispheric coherence cannot be ascribed to the influence of a common reference, each hemisphere having its own independent reference electrode [46,47]. Another problem for a high-density EEG is about spurious coherence due to volume conduction effects: however, since we were mainly interested in comparing coherence between contrasting surgical approaches, rather than assessing contribution of different cortical areas, concerns about volume conduction are of secondary relevance [33]. …”

Robotic Surgery: A Solution in Search of a Problem—A Bayesian Analysis of 343 Robotic Procedures Performed by a Single Surgical Team

“…Other authors report the removal of 17.5 nodes, 63 18 nodes, 64 and 25.9 nodes. 65 These results are comparable to our average of 22.23 nodes (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). 50,61 Most of the authors recommend the use of minimal surgery in cervical cancer stages IA2-IB2, until a maximum of IIA.…”

The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial

“…Currently, tumor location, patient characteristics, surgical indication, and complexity are crucial factors when clinicians are deciding on a surgical approach. 6,15,16 Our results showed that the risk of severe morbidity related to the tumor site (cervix vs endometrium) was significant in the univariate analysis, but no longer significant in the multivariable model. We observed no significant interaction between surgery method and tumor site.…”

How does a surgeon’s brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot

“…Under these experimental conditions, and with the aid of a high density recording system, any observed stimulus – dependent change in interhemispheric coherence cannot be ascribed to the influence of a common reference, each hemisphere having its own independent reference electrode [46,47]. Another problem for a high-density EEG is about spurious coherence due to volume conduction effects: however, since we were mainly interested in comparing coherence between contrasting surgical approaches, rather than assessing contribution of different cortical areas, concerns about volume conduction are of secondary relevance [33]. …”

Robotic Surgery: A Solution in Search of a Problem—A Bayesian Analysis of 343 Robotic Procedures Performed by a Single Surgical Team

“…Other authors report the removal of 17.5 nodes, 63 18 nodes, 64 and 25.9 nodes. 65 These results are comparable to our average of 22.23 nodes (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). 50,61 Most of the authors recommend the use of minimal surgery in cervical cancer stages IA2-IB2, until a maximum of IIA.…”

The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial

“…Currently, tumor location, patient characteristics, surgical indication, and complexity are crucial factors when clinicians are deciding on a surgical approach. 6,15,16 Our results showed that the risk of severe morbidity related to the tumor site (cervix vs endometrium) was significant in the univariate analysis, but no longer significant in the multivariable model. We observed no significant interaction between surgery method and tumor site.…”

How does a surgeon’s brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot

“…Under these experimental conditions, and with the aid of a high density recording system, any observed stimulus – dependent change in interhemispheric coherence cannot be ascribed to the influence of a common reference, each hemisphere having its own independent reference electrode [46,47]. Another problem for a high-density EEG is about spurious coherence due to volume conduction effects: however, since we were mainly interested in comparing coherence between contrasting surgical approaches, rather than assessing contribution of different cortical areas, concerns about volume conduction are of secondary relevance [33]. …”