2017
DOI: 10.1177/0967010617713157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot Wars: US Empire and geopolitics in the robotic age

Abstract: How will the robot age transform warfare? What geopolitical futures are being imagined by the US military? This article constructs a robotic futurology to examine these crucial questions. Its central concern is how robots – driven by leaps in artificial intelligence and swarming – are rewiring the spaces and logics of US empire, warfare, and geopolitics. The article begins by building a more-than-human geopolitics to de-center the role of humans in conflict and foreground a worldly understanding of robots. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to the above concerns, robots are also transforming the spaces, politics, and subjects of security (e.g. Shaw , , ). From biometric borders, automated gun turrets to mobile sea mines, a new class of robotic apparatuses are being developed, each of which embodies (and mobilises) a future geography.…”
Section: The “Rise Of the Robots”mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Related to the above concerns, robots are also transforming the spaces, politics, and subjects of security (e.g. Shaw , , ). From biometric borders, automated gun turrets to mobile sea mines, a new class of robotic apparatuses are being developed, each of which embodies (and mobilises) a future geography.…”
Section: The “Rise Of the Robots”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this work on robots and robotic technologies is partially related to but also parallels the recent wave of attention to and growth of geographic research produced through, by, and of the digital, what Ash et al () have termed a critical “digital turn” in geography. This turn has focused on questions of smart cities (Datta ), digital media and communication (Adams ), the security state (Shaw , , ), and the automation of environmental conservation (Adams ; Arts et al ), writ large. It does less, though, to think through the reimagination of human–non‐human relations, subjectivities, and potentialities that come to be possible in a world already populated by robotic possibilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It then fell out of favor. Some commentators came to criticize the RMA as fundamentally misguided (McMaster, 2008), while others pointed to robots as the ‘real’ revolution (Shaw, 2017; Singer, 2009). It is reasonable to hypothesize that such discourse is common.…”
Section: Theoretical Propositions: Technology Hype and National Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such technologies may decrease the risk of physical harm to human operators, they may simultaneously increase cognitive load, which could in turn deplete executive functioning and increase vulnerability to emotion dysregulation. Increasingly, for example, there is evidence of relatively high rates of depression, PTSD, and suicide among drone pilots (Brooks, 2016; Horowitz, Kreps, & Furhman, 2016; Shaw, 2017; Singer, 2009).…”
Section: Why Emotion Dysregulation Is So Prevalent In the Contemporarmentioning
confidence: 99%