Robot Voices in Daily Life: Vocal Human-Likeness and Application Context as Determinants of User Acceptance

Abstract

The growing popularity of speech interfaces goes hand in hand with the creation of synthetic voices that sound ever more human. Previous research has been inconclusive about whether anthropomorphic design features of machines are more likely to be associated with positive user responses or, conversely, with uncanny experiences. To avoid detrimental effects of synthetic voice design, it is therefore crucial to explore what level of human realism human interactors prefer and whether their evaluations may vary across different domains of application. In a randomized laboratory experiment, 165 participants listened to one of five female-sounding robot voices, each with a different degree of human realism. We assessed how much participants anthropomorphized the voice (by subjective human-likeness ratings, a name-giving task and an imagination task), how pleasant and how eerie they found it, and to what extent they would accept its use in various domains. Additionally, participants completed Big Five personality measures and a tolerance of ambiguity scale. Our results indicate a positive relationship between human-likeness and user acceptance, with the most realistic sounding voice scoring highest in pleasantness and lowest in eeriness. Participants were also more likely to assign real human names to the voice (e.g., “Julia” instead of “T380”) if it sounded more realistic. In terms of application context, participants overall indicated lower acceptance of the use of speech interfaces in social domains (care, companionship) than in others (e.g., information & navigation), though the most human-like voice was rated significantly more acceptable in social applications than the remaining four. While most personality factors did not prove influential, openness to experience was found to moderate the relationship between voice type and user acceptance such that individuals with higher openness scores rated the most human-like voice even more positively. Study results are discussed in the light of the presented theory and in relation to open research questions in the field of synthetic voice design.

War feels less horrid in a foreign accent: exploring the impact of the foreign accent on emotionality

“…Furthermore, using Speech Synthesis Markup Language (SSML), Azure can modify various aspects of speech, including tone, mood, and even specific characteristics of the voice. The use or the listening of synthetic voices is no longer something unusual, as nowadays, 4.2 million digital voice assistants like Apple's Siri and Amazon's Alexa (Schreibelmayr and Mara, 2022) are already being employed in our daily lives. Therefore, the use of voices generated through Artificial Intelligence, with their increasingly life-like quality and versatility, is becoming more common in different contexts, such as in the language teaching field.…”

Expectations and beyond: The nexus of AI instrumentality and brand credibility in voice assistant retention using extended expectation‐confirmation model

“…AIVAs portray a level of humanness with proficient natural language processing and surreal personification of AIVAs. It is a baseline requirement for developers of AIVAs to seek to fuel users' perception as human‐like as far as possible to strengthen their connection with them (Habler et al, 2019; Schreibelmayr & Mara, 2022). For example, certain brands endow AIVAs with unique personalities and provide the capability of friendly banter (Steinbruck, 2019).…”

Factors influencing consumers’ willingness to accept service robots: Based on online reviews of Chinese hotels

“…Anthropomorphism means that products have psychological characteristics (emotions, personalities, gestures, and other human-like appearance) and non-psychological characteristics, that is, there are similarities with human body (such as head, eyes, arms, legs, etc.) ( Keeley, 2004 ; Schreibelmayr and Mara, 2022 ). There is no consistent conclusion about the role of anthropomorphism in product evaluation.…”

“…Generation Z customers consider that robots reduce contagion risk at hotels ( Romero and Lado, 2021 ). Although robot technology is particularly important in hotels, the related research topics of human–robot interaction are still preliminary ( Ivanov et al, 2018b ; Schreibelmayr and Mara, 2022 ), in which consumers’ acceptance and willingness to use service robots is the focus.…”