2007
DOI: 10.1080/02522667.2007.10699780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot inverse kinematics via neural and neurofuzzy networks: architectural and computational aspects for improved performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean error presented in [1] is 0.9 mm, with standard deviation of 2.9 mm implying that are points in the workspace that the error is higher than the one presented in this paper. Finally, the RMS error presented in [8] was less than 2 % which is much greater than the one presented in this paper.…”
Section: Simulated Experiments and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean error presented in [1] is 0.9 mm, with standard deviation of 2.9 mm implying that are points in the workspace that the error is higher than the one presented in this paper. Finally, the RMS error presented in [8] was less than 2 % which is much greater than the one presented in this paper.…”
Section: Simulated Experiments and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…An algorithm [8] which used radial basis function networks and two fuzzy logic methods to determine all the solutions of the IKP was presented. The training data were distinguished manually based on prior knowledge of the multiple configurations corresponding to a given pose of the robot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedforward neural networks used in their study had a single hidden layer [13]. Raptis & Tzafestas obtained inverse kinematics of the PUMA 3R manipulator via Neurofuzzy and Neural Networks [23]. Almusawi et.al., proposed a multilayer neural network with 6 input variables to solve inverse kinematics of Denso VP6242 robotic arm [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two important factors motivated the investigation of better prediction models as the dimensionality of the ANN search spaces was set higher: i.e. the inclusion of the orientation of the robot in the input vector and use of robots with higher DoF [19,[30][31][32][33]. In a recent study, El-Sherbiny et al [19] applied three soft-computing methods -MLP, AN-FIS, and GA -to solve the inverse kinematics of a 5 DoF robotic arm.…”
Section: Survey On Data-driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as in the other studies, the results were restricted to a particular robot in a limited workspace. Raptis and Tzafestas [32] [38] also used a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) with different sizes (18x18, 36x36 and 72x72) to learn the inverse kinematics of an Aura robotic arm with only 2 DoF and confined to two well-defined trajectories: linear and planar.…”
Section: Survey On Data-driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%