2019
DOI: 10.1145/3344286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot Expressive Motions

Abstract: Robots that have different forms and capabilities are used in a wide variety of situations; however, one common point to all robots interacting with humans is their ability to communicate with them. In addition to verbal communication or purely communicative movements, robots can also use their embodiment to generate expressive movements while achieving a task, to convey additional information to its human partner. This article surveys state-of-the-art techniques that generate whole-body expressive movements i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued that mutual interaction between humans and humans is needed if robots should be considered as partners instead of as tools [17,19,30,[35][36][37], but to what extent they need to grasp the intentions of others is a much debated issue. However, at least it is argued that to achieve some kind of action and intention recognition between humans and robots, which possibly is a pre-requisite for some basic social interaction skills [24,26,28,30], is necessary for developing into engaging in more advanced forms of social interaction such as joint actions and mutual collaboration [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. In other words, it requires that robots are able to perceive similar emotional and behavioral patterns and environmental cues as humans do (e.g., [1,5,[53][54][55]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that mutual interaction between humans and humans is needed if robots should be considered as partners instead of as tools [17,19,30,[35][36][37], but to what extent they need to grasp the intentions of others is a much debated issue. However, at least it is argued that to achieve some kind of action and intention recognition between humans and robots, which possibly is a pre-requisite for some basic social interaction skills [24,26,28,30], is necessary for developing into engaging in more advanced forms of social interaction such as joint actions and mutual collaboration [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. In other words, it requires that robots are able to perceive similar emotional and behavioral patterns and environmental cues as humans do (e.g., [1,5,[53][54][55]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sharma et al (2013) also previously used these two characteristics of the Laban Effort System to explore how they impacted people’s perception of robotic motions, specifically flight paths. These categories are also well reflected within categories mentioned throughout ( Venture and Kulić, 2019 ). This taxonomy is presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Body language represents an extremely powerful and complex form of communication. Robotic agents can also leverage expressive motions to convey a variety of information to people interacting with them [91]. What emerged from the ndings of our study is that pilots are able to express their unique body languages through their avatars using solely a combination of head movements and small sub-set of pre-programmed movements available through OriHime and OriHime-D.…”
Section: A Dierent Form Of Embodimentmentioning
confidence: 88%