2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30357-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
254
3
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
254
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to 28% of patients were distressed prior to their surgery for prostate cancer. The proportion of patients indicating psychological distress remained stable across time with 21% distressed 24 months later (Table ) . The pattern of domain‐specific QoL scores across time is presented in Tables and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Up to 28% of patients were distressed prior to their surgery for prostate cancer. The proportion of patients indicating psychological distress remained stable across time with 21% distressed 24 months later (Table ) . The pattern of domain‐specific QoL scores across time is presented in Tables and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These data are from a randomised controlled trial comparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy with robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, with trial outcome data reported elsewhere . Patients for this study were managed at the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital (RBWH) with referrals to the public clinics from general practice and the private practices of urologists in SE Queensland in Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comprehensive meta-analyses [3][4][5] of retrospective institutional series, as well as the only available randomized controlled trail [6,7], did not provide definitive data on the superiority of one surgical approach over the others. On the whole, these studies have been criticized because of arbitrary outcome definitions, lack of validated outcome measures, short follow-up time, disparities in surgeon's experience and inclusion of series from single surgeons or high volume institutions [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment armamentarium for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer is variable, and surgical techniques have evolved to render better patient outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is purported to provide superior results with regards to patient recovery along with equivalent oncological control compared with open surgery . In tandem with the increase in the number of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed, interest in health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) among prostate cancer patients has also peaked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%