Robot-assisted cannulated compression screw internal fixation for treatment of femoral neck fracture in children: A case series of ten patients

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted cannulated compression screw internal fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in children.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of ten children with femoral neck fractures treated by robot-assisted internal fixation from January 2020 to June 2021. The clinical and radiological characteristics, operation duration, and fluoroscopy frequency of robot-assisted screws placement together with the complications and function were evaluated. At the 12-month follow-up, the hip joint function was evaluated using the Ratliff classification.ResultsTen children, six boys and four girls, aged 4–14 years were included. There were eight type II and three type III femoral neck fractures using the Delbet classification. In the process of robot-assisted internal fixation, the median of fluoroscopy frequency was 22 times and the median of operation duration was 47 min. The median of screw parallelism was 1.33° and 0.66° on the anteroposterior and lateral x-ray films, and the median of screw distribution was 41.86% and 44.93% on the anteroposterior and lateral x-ray films, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, there were two cases of femoral head necrosis, and fracture healing was achieved in all patients, of which eight fractures were excellent and three were good by the Ratliff function classification.DiscussionThe application of robot-assisted cannulated compression screw internal fixation could help us achieve more safe and accurate screw placement, as well as a good treatment effect for children’s femoral neck fractures.Level of EvidenceLevel IV. retrospective case series.

Robot-assisted Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis With Eight-plates for Lower Extremity Deformities in Children

“…They found that in the TiRobot group, screw parallelism was improved (1.32° vs. 2.54° on the anteroposterior radiograph, 1.42° vs. 3.09° on lateral radiograph) and the distance between screws was increased (58.44 vs. 39.69 mm) compared with the conventional group (all P <0.05). The same conclusion was reached in studies by Duan et al 24 and Feng et al 25 . Although no studies have evaluated the accuracy of robot-assisted screw placement with eight-plates, the present study suggests that the TiRobot can improve the accuracy of screw placement.…”