Robotic Soccer 2007
DOI: 10.5772/5147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RoboCup@Home: Creating and Benchmarking Tomorrows Service Robot Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, having presented the classical line of reasoning arriving towards the utility of equipping robots with natural language capabilities, and having discussed a space of possibilities regarding role assignment between human and robot, let us now move to the second, more concrete, albeit less general avenue towards justifying conversational robots: namely, specific applications, existing or potential. Such applications, where natural human-robot interaction capabilities with verbal and non-verbal aspects would be desirable, include: flexible manufacturing robots; lab or household robotic assistants [30], [31], [32], [33]; assistive robotics and companions for special groups of people [34]; persuasive robotics (for example, [35]); robotic receptionists [36], robotic educational assistants, robotic wheelchairs [37], companion robots [38], all the way to more exotic domains, such as robotic theatre actors [39], musicians [40], dancers [41] etc.…”
Section: Motivation: Interactive Robots With Natural Language Capmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, having presented the classical line of reasoning arriving towards the utility of equipping robots with natural language capabilities, and having discussed a space of possibilities regarding role assignment between human and robot, let us now move to the second, more concrete, albeit less general avenue towards justifying conversational robots: namely, specific applications, existing or potential. Such applications, where natural human-robot interaction capabilities with verbal and non-verbal aspects would be desirable, include: flexible manufacturing robots; lab or household robotic assistants [30], [31], [32], [33]; assistive robotics and companions for special groups of people [34]; persuasive robotics (for example, [35]); robotic receptionists [36], robotic educational assistants, robotic wheelchairs [37], companion robots [38], all the way to more exotic domains, such as robotic theatre actors [39], musicians [40], dancers [41] etc.…”
Section: Motivation: Interactive Robots With Natural Language Capmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benchmarking the advancement based solely in the competition results can be deceiving. Every year rules are tuned, scores are modified, and the difficulty degree is adjusted, 1 The authors belong to several teams who have participated in RoboCup@Home as early as 2007 2 Source: http://youtu.be/I1kN1bAeeB0/ Retrieved: Jan 1st, 2018. making impossible to estimate the overall progress achieved by means of a direct quantitative comparison of the scores. Even more, scores often reflect the subjective criterion of the referee regarding the solution of a task as required by the rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement of the robot is controlled by a remote caregiver who can monitor the elderly person using the camera mounted on the robot. The Robocup@Home initiative even proposes and runs competitions concerning the abilities of home service robots [10].…”
Section: Recent Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%