2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.06.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robocasting of reaction bonded silicon carbide structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several components have been successfully manufactured by combining 3D printing with liquid silicon infiltration, which involves the infiltration of a carbon (C) porous preform with molten silicon (Si) at a temperature exceeding its melting point (1414 • C). 21,22 Several types of preforms can be manufactured via different AM approaches: binder jetting, 22 direct or indirect selective laser sintering, 24,25 laminated object manufacturing, 26 robocasting, 14 extrusion free forming, 22 direct ink writing, and stereolithography. 27 The drawbacks of these approaches are the low relative density, low mechanical strength, and coarse resolution of the parts with respect to the traditional approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several components have been successfully manufactured by combining 3D printing with liquid silicon infiltration, which involves the infiltration of a carbon (C) porous preform with molten silicon (Si) at a temperature exceeding its melting point (1414 • C). 21,22 Several types of preforms can be manufactured via different AM approaches: binder jetting, 22 direct or indirect selective laser sintering, 24,25 laminated object manufacturing, 26 robocasting, 14 extrusion free forming, 22 direct ink writing, and stereolithography. 27 The drawbacks of these approaches are the low relative density, low mechanical strength, and coarse resolution of the parts with respect to the traditional approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discussed the influences of SiC paste preparation, zeta potential, pH value, viscosity, rheological properties, robocasting processing parameters, and SPS temperature on the microstructure and macrostructure of the final complex-shaped SiC ceramic in detail. Wahl et al [68] also developed a SiC ceramic paste containing C, then used robocasting to prepare a SiC/C ceramic green body, and finally achieved a SiC ceramic by using reaction sintering and LSI, as shown in Fig. 19(b).…”
Section: Robocastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some interesting features could be achieved using this type of materials such as controlled swelling, predicted shape alterations, functionalities change and self-assembly. 94 Self-shaping geometries, like as bending, twisting or combinations of these two basic movements, can be implemented by programming the material's microstructure to undergo local anisotropic shrinkage during heat treatment, as presented in Figure 8. This functional design may be achieved by magnetically aligning functionalized ceramic platelets in a liquid ceramic suspension, subsequently consolidated through an established enzyme-catalysed reaction, and finally achieved deliberate control over shape change during the sintering step.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%