1969
DOI: 10.2307/1378351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robertsonian Polymorphism in the Cotton Rat, Sigmodon fulviventer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meylan 6 described (but did not illustrate) the Y-chromosome of his material as being a very small metacentric chromosome, whereas we found it to be a small acrocentric. Lee and Zimmerman 20 do not describe the Y-chromosome in their specimens. Blarina carolinensis (Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Meylan 6 described (but did not illustrate) the Y-chromosome of his material as being a very small metacentric chromosome, whereas we found it to be a small acrocentric. Lee and Zimmerman 20 do not describe the Y-chromosome in their specimens. Blarina carolinensis (Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They also recognized S. zanjonensis which they concluded may or may not be specifically distinct [Carleton et al, 1999;Musser and Carleton, 2005]. Of these 13 species, karyotypes for 9 (S. alleni , S. arizonae , S. fulviventer , S. hirsutus , S. hispidus , S. leucotis , S. mascotensis , S. ochragnathus , and S. toltecus) [Hsu and Benirschke, 1968;Kiblisky, 1969;Lee and Zimmerman, 1969;Zimmerman, 1970;Carroll et al, 2005] have been described with non differentially stained chromosomes, G-bands, and C-bands [Zimmerman, 1970;Elder, 1980;Elder and Lee, 1985]. Diploid numbers ranged from 22 to 82 and fundamental number (total number of autosomal arms) ranged from 34 to 82; G-band data indicate that S. hispidus , S. leucotis , S. alleni , S. ochragnathus , S. arizonae , and S. mascotensis form a species group to the exclusion of S. fulviventer which Elder and Lee [1985] placed in its own species group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of introgression might be due to differences in the number of Robertsonian polymorphisms that occurs within B. brevicauda and B. hylophaga (Meylan 1967;Lee and Zimmerman 1969;Genoways et al 1977;George et al 1982;Oshida et al 2003), which likely reduces fitness (Searle 1993). Several hybrid zone studies have documented limited introgression between species with chromosomal rearrangements (Bradley et al 1991;Basset et al 2007;Genoways et al 2008).…”
Section: Extent Of Hybridization and Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems during the pairing and segregation phases of meiosis caused by increased chromosomal heterozygosity can reduce hybrid fitness (Baker and Bickham 1986). This explanation seems highly plausible given the number of Robertsonian polymorphisms that occurs within B. brevicauda and B. hylophaga (Meylan 1967;Lee and Zimmerman 1969;Genoways et al 1977;George et al 1982;Oshida et al 2003;Thompson and Hoffman 2009). Thus, the chromosomal rearrangements between B. brevicauda and B. hylophaga might be a strong isolating mechanism (Shaw et al 1993;Benedict et al 2006).…”
Section: Extent Of Hybridization and Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%