1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02856567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robertsonian fusion and centric fission in karyotype evolution of higher plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
81
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1998). Such observations have been seen in other lineages of the monocots, such as Commelinaceae, in which Robertsonian changes are well known (Jones 1998). A similar pattern is found in Asphodelaceae, in which DNA amounts vary twofold just among diploid species of Aloe with the same number of chromosomes (Brandham and Doherty 1998).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Evolution and Telomere Composition Insupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1998). Such observations have been seen in other lineages of the monocots, such as Commelinaceae, in which Robertsonian changes are well known (Jones 1998). A similar pattern is found in Asphodelaceae, in which DNA amounts vary twofold just among diploid species of Aloe with the same number of chromosomes (Brandham and Doherty 1998).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Evolution and Telomere Composition Insupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Such centromere repositioning events, accompanied by a shift in the centromere-associated tandem DNA repeat, appear to have been important in chromosome number evolution within the cucurbits (Han et al, 2009). Nonetheless, polyploidy has been concluded to be the major source of chromosome number increases in plants (Jones, 1998), except in a few odd lineages such as Zamia (Olson and Gorelick, 2011), slipper orchids (Cox et al, 1998) and sedges (Chung et al, 2012). In sedges, which have holocentric chromosomes, fission may be common in part because the lack of localized centromeres allows breakage anywhere along a chromosome with relatively low risks of meiotic dysfunction (Chung et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely related taxa often differ by a least a few structural rearrangements, and more distantly related taxa within genera often differ in chromosome number as well. In plants, polyploidy is an important source of chromosomal change, and doublings or near-doublings in chromosome number within families are often assumed to result from tetraploidy events (Jones, 1998;Wood et al, 2009). Nonetheless, changes in chromosome number between sister lineages may also occur by chromosome fission and fusion (Schubert and Lysak, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the Robertsonian translocation between 2 smaller chromosomes may have occurred during the evolution of Bixa. Robertsonian interchange is characterized by centromeric fusion (Jones 1998, Zhang et al 2001, Oakey and Beechey 2002, Switonski et al 2003 between 2 acrocentric (Gupta and Gupta 1991) or telocentric (Zhang et al 2001) non-homologous chromosomes, resulting in one metacentric chromosome (Gupta and Gupta 1991, Jones 1998, Zhang et al 2001, Oakey and Beechey 2002. Considering that many species present the SC in the distal portion of the short arm (Leitch and HeslopHarrison 1992, Hanson et al 1996, Liu et al 1997) and the morphometric data of the chromosome 1, a break involving the long arm of 1 chromosome and the short arm of the other probably led to the formation of the metacentric chromosome 1 with the SC adjacent to the centromere, during the genomic evolution of these species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%