1991
DOI: 10.1127/phyto/20/1991/111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roadside vegetation in mediterranean France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study provides an assembly-based approach for selecting suitable native plants on the basis of their traits that helps to fill this gap and has an important advantage as regards approaches based on species names already proposed for roadslopes in a large range of climatic conditions (i.e. Bochet et al, 2010b;Cilliers and Bredenkamp, 2000;Godefroid and Tanghe, 2001;Heindl and Ullmann, 1991;Ullmann et al, 1995). While lists of species names are site-specific and not easily comparable among sites, trait-based characterizations can be easily transferred and applied across restoration projects at a broader scale, whatever the regional settings and local species pools (Fischer et al, 2013;Pywell et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study provides an assembly-based approach for selecting suitable native plants on the basis of their traits that helps to fill this gap and has an important advantage as regards approaches based on species names already proposed for roadslopes in a large range of climatic conditions (i.e. Bochet et al, 2010b;Cilliers and Bredenkamp, 2000;Godefroid and Tanghe, 2001;Heindl and Ullmann, 1991;Ullmann et al, 1995). While lists of species names are site-specific and not easily comparable among sites, trait-based characterizations can be easily transferred and applied across restoration projects at a broader scale, whatever the regional settings and local species pools (Fischer et al, 2013;Pywell et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deductive method is therefore most frequently used for syntaxonomic evaluation of anthropogenic communities, whose variability was only hardly renderable by the hitherto classification procedures of the Braun-Blanquet approach (Braakhekke & Ilsink 1976;Holzner 1978;Husdkovd 1988;Kopeck3~ 1974Kopeck3~ -1986Sandov~i 1978;Brandes 1981Brandes -1991Mucina 1982Mucina -1987Gr~ll 1982Gr~ll -1984Markovi6 1984;G6dde 1986;Ullmann & Heindl 1987;Stottele & Schmidt 1987;Sudnik-W6jcikowska 1987;Py~ek P. & Py~ek A. 1988;Arts et al 1988;Moravcov~i 1988;Vevle 1988;Asmus 1990;Bergmeier 1990;Koblihov~i 1990;Heindl & Ullmann 1991;Py~ek 1991;Vi~hdk 1989Vi~hdk -1991Griese 1991;Heindl 1992;Kopeck3~ & Hejn~ 1990, etc.). However, already the basic concept of the deductive method assumes that in the syntaxonomic evaluation of the anthropogenic and natural vegetation different methodic approaches cannot be used.…”
Section: Order Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, disturbed habitats could also function as a refuge for rare and endangered plants (Greenwood and Gemmell, 1978;Heindl and Ullmann, 1991;Ullmann et al, 1998;Brändle et al, 2003;Nowak, 2005Nowak, , 2006Esfeld et al, 2008;Kirpluk and Bomanowska, 2008;Reisch, 2006;van Kleef et al, 2012;Zielińska et al, 2016). Surprisingly, orchids are often found in the apophytes group, but they are still one of the most threatened plant groups in the world (Sharrock and Jones, 2009;Bliz et al, 2011;The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015).…”
Section: Orchidaceae In Anthropogenic Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%