2024
DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.en-8597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roadmap for the integration of gastro‐intestinal (GI) tract microbiomes (human and domestic animal) in risk assessments under EFSA's remit

Francisco Javier Moreno,
Florencio Pazos,
Manuel Garrido‐Romero
et al.

Abstract: This report describes the work developed during the execution of the Review Impact MICrobiome In Assesment (RIMICIA) project. This project has performed a comprehensive and critical assessment of the evidence-based research about: i) the impact of dietary compounds in the human and some domestic animals (i.e., poultry, ruminants and pigs) gut microbiome; ii) the most representative in vitro and in vivo models of the human gut microbiota currently used in microbiome research studies; and iii) the methodology us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 328 publications
(599 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This translates through addressing challenges such as zoonotic and (re-)emerging infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases linked to environmental risk factors, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and climate change mitigation ( 80–82 ). For instance, in the context of antimicrobial resistance, the incorporation of the gut microbiome in food safety risk assessment of xenobiotics is also investigated to elucidate their involvement in the balance between health and disease ( 83 , 84 ). Additionally, the use of alternative tools, such as New Approach Methodologies, is also investigated for the new risk assessment approaches, fostering a future with less or no animal testing in food safety ( 85–87 ).…”
Section: Discussion Ongoing Trends and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This translates through addressing challenges such as zoonotic and (re-)emerging infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases linked to environmental risk factors, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and climate change mitigation ( 80–82 ). For instance, in the context of antimicrobial resistance, the incorporation of the gut microbiome in food safety risk assessment of xenobiotics is also investigated to elucidate their involvement in the balance between health and disease ( 83 , 84 ). Additionally, the use of alternative tools, such as New Approach Methodologies, is also investigated for the new risk assessment approaches, fostering a future with less or no animal testing in food safety ( 85–87 ).…”
Section: Discussion Ongoing Trends and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the integrated perspective of the One Health framework, the implementation of guidance or methodology to systematically account for possible effects on microbiomes or effects by microbiomes on human/animal/plant health has become necessary. Two thematic grants were awarded in 2020: one to evaluate the impact on/by gastro-intestinal (GI) tract microbiomes (human and domestic animal) in assessments under EFSA's remit (Lot 1; see Moreno et al, 2023Moreno et al, , 2024; and one to evaluate the impact on/by environmental microbiomes (plants, wildlife, soil) in assessments under EFSA's remit (Lot 2).…”
Section: Background and Terms Of Reference As Provided By The Requestormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the term microbiome is broader than microbiota (Hou et al., 2022 ). No EFSA guidance addresses the impact of NGT‐Ms on the gut microbiome (Moreno et al., 2024 ). However, the term gut microbiota and the requirements to assess the impact on the human and animal gut are mentioned in the GMM guidance (EFSA GMO Panel, 2011a ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%