2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2014.6968515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road extraction from airborne LiDAR data using SBF and CD-TIN

Abstract: This paper proposes a method for automated road extraction from airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. The method combines Segmentation Based Filtering (SBF) with Triangular Irregular Network-based segmentation to extract the road points. The method contains two major steps. Firstly, Segmentation Based Filtering (SBF) is applied to LiDAR data for initial segmentation of road regions. Here, region growing algorithm is applied after detecting outliers and subsequently, ground reference points are als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Completeness, correctness and RMS differences were used to evaluate performance of 6 submitted results, where the completeness and correctness were, respectively, around 0.7 and 0.85, while the RMS difference was no more 3.74 pixels. The criteria for evaluating complete extracted road were to test automatic road detection for individual roads (Cheng et al;Kumar et al, 2013;Miraliakbari A. et al, 2015;Narwade and Musande, 2014;Yang et al, 2013). Amongst these, Kumar et al (Kumar et al, 2013), evaluated the extracted roads by using a point cloud of road edges, while Miraliakbari et al (2015) evaluated their work by using detected road areas.…”
Section: As An Example As Part Of the Eurosdr (European Spatial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completeness, correctness and RMS differences were used to evaluate performance of 6 submitted results, where the completeness and correctness were, respectively, around 0.7 and 0.85, while the RMS difference was no more 3.74 pixels. The criteria for evaluating complete extracted road were to test automatic road detection for individual roads (Cheng et al;Kumar et al, 2013;Miraliakbari A. et al, 2015;Narwade and Musande, 2014;Yang et al, 2013). Amongst these, Kumar et al (Kumar et al, 2013), evaluated the extracted roads by using a point cloud of road edges, while Miraliakbari et al (2015) evaluated their work by using detected road areas.…”
Section: As An Example As Part Of the Eurosdr (European Spatial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%