2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2449074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road Boundaries Detection Based on Local Normal Saliency From Mobile Laser Scanning Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a properly normalized reflectance attribute along with a uniform and dense point cloud will provide an improved extraction of road edges in both the sections. Yang, Fang, and Li [21] and Wang et al [24] validated the kerb edges extracted from MLS data by detailing an average completeness values of 95.13% and 95.41%, respectively, while average correctness values of 97.04% and 99.35%, respectively. Guan, Li, Yu, Chapman, and Wang [23] reported an average horizontal and vertical root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.08 and 0.02 m, respectively, for the kerb edges extracted from MLS data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a properly normalized reflectance attribute along with a uniform and dense point cloud will provide an improved extraction of road edges in both the sections. Yang, Fang, and Li [21] and Wang et al [24] validated the kerb edges extracted from MLS data by detailing an average completeness values of 95.13% and 95.41%, respectively, while average correctness values of 97.04% and 99.35%, respectively. Guan, Li, Yu, Chapman, and Wang [23] reported an average horizontal and vertical root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.08 and 0.02 m, respectively, for the kerb edges extracted from MLS data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The road marking outputs were evaluated by making their comparison with manual interpretation, while the validation of kerb edges was reported in [23] based on estimating their Euclidean distance with reference ground points collected using total station. Wang et al [24] developed a method for detecting kerb edges from MLS point cloud in an urban environment. The point cloud data were partitioned into a number of overlapping data blocks based on vehicle trajectory, and then, salient points in each block were extracted by projecting the distance of each point's normal vector to the point cloud's dominant vector into a hyperbolic tangent function space.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these algorithms are computationally intensive and time-consuming. Edge-based methods [32][33][34][35][36][37] first detect and fit linear road edges, and then segment the road surface using these edges. Point cloud features, such as the normal vector [32] and elevation difference [33], are commonly used to detect road edges or curbs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edge-based methods [32][33][34][35][36][37] first detect and fit linear road edges, and then segment the road surface using these edges. Point cloud features, such as the normal vector [32] and elevation difference [33], are commonly used to detect road edges or curbs. To improve the computational efficiency, scan lines [34], grids [35] and voxels [36] are used as the basis of road extraction from the point cloud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The on-road points occupy the biggest part of MLS points in road. Extraction methods [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14] aimed at detecting and extracting on-road objects (e.g., driving lines, road boundaries, road cracks and road manholes) performed well both in accuracy and precision. The off-road points could be used to identify and extract traffic signs, trees, power lines and light poles, holes, and cracks in sidewalks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%