Abstract:Background
Endometrial carcinoma comprises a group of tumors with distinct histologic and molecular features, and clinical behavior. Here we sought to define the biological processes that govern the clinical behavior of endometrial cancers.
Methods
Sixteen prototype genes representative of different biological processes that would likely play a role in endometrial and other hormone-driven cancers were defined. RNA-sequencing gene expression data from 323 endometrial cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas were … Show more
“…However, in the recurrent setting, reevaluation of MMR status in the operative biopsy should be considered as this may qualify for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor. Studies have previously suggested MSH6 as a potential prognostic marker in endometrial cancer, where high MSH6 in hysterectomy tissue is associated with poor outcome and nonendometrioid subtype [19,35]. Our data validate these findings and demonstrates a strong prognostic value in preoperative samples in this large prospective endometrial cancer cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…High MSH6 also yields prognostic value across other cancer types, suggesting that MSH6 may function to promote aggressive tumour behaviour [13][14][15][16][17]19]. However, the mechanism underlying overexpression of MSH6 is largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, increased mRNA expression of PMS2 is associated with improved overall survival in ovarian cancer [ 18 ], MSH2 fails to predict progression-free survival in bladder cancer and high MSH2 predicts improved overall survival in Stage I–II colon cancer [ 16 ]. To our knowledge, only one study has explored differential MMR protein expression in relation to prognosis in endometrial cancer, where high MSH6 (RNA and protein) associated with poor disease-free survival in a cohort of 243 patients with mostly endometrioid histologies [ 19 ].…”
Background
The endometrial cancer mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroup is defined by loss of MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 or MLH1. We compare MMR status in paired preoperative and operative samples and investigate the prognostic impact of differential MMR protein expression levels.
Methods
Tumour lesions from 1058 endometrial cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 and MLH1. MMR protein expression was evaluated as loss or intact to determine MMR status, or by staining index to evaluate the prognostic potential of differential expression. Gene expression data from a local (n = 235) and the TCGA (n = 524) endometrial cancer cohorts was used for validation.
Results
We identified a substantial agreement in MMR status between paired curettage and hysterectomy samples. Individual high expression of all four MMR markers associated with non-endometrioid subtype, and high MSH6 or MSH2 strongly associated with several aggressive disease characteristics including high tumour grade and FIGO stage, and for MSH6, with lymph node metastasis. In multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 remained an independent prognostic marker, also within the endometrioid low-grade subgroup (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
We demonstrate that in addition to determine MMR status, MMR protein expression levels, particularly MSH6, may add prognostic information in endometrial cancer.
“…However, in the recurrent setting, reevaluation of MMR status in the operative biopsy should be considered as this may qualify for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor. Studies have previously suggested MSH6 as a potential prognostic marker in endometrial cancer, where high MSH6 in hysterectomy tissue is associated with poor outcome and nonendometrioid subtype [19,35]. Our data validate these findings and demonstrates a strong prognostic value in preoperative samples in this large prospective endometrial cancer cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…High MSH6 also yields prognostic value across other cancer types, suggesting that MSH6 may function to promote aggressive tumour behaviour [13][14][15][16][17]19]. However, the mechanism underlying overexpression of MSH6 is largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, increased mRNA expression of PMS2 is associated with improved overall survival in ovarian cancer [ 18 ], MSH2 fails to predict progression-free survival in bladder cancer and high MSH2 predicts improved overall survival in Stage I–II colon cancer [ 16 ]. To our knowledge, only one study has explored differential MMR protein expression in relation to prognosis in endometrial cancer, where high MSH6 (RNA and protein) associated with poor disease-free survival in a cohort of 243 patients with mostly endometrioid histologies [ 19 ].…”
Background
The endometrial cancer mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroup is defined by loss of MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 or MLH1. We compare MMR status in paired preoperative and operative samples and investigate the prognostic impact of differential MMR protein expression levels.
Methods
Tumour lesions from 1058 endometrial cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 and MLH1. MMR protein expression was evaluated as loss or intact to determine MMR status, or by staining index to evaluate the prognostic potential of differential expression. Gene expression data from a local (n = 235) and the TCGA (n = 524) endometrial cancer cohorts was used for validation.
Results
We identified a substantial agreement in MMR status between paired curettage and hysterectomy samples. Individual high expression of all four MMR markers associated with non-endometrioid subtype, and high MSH6 or MSH2 strongly associated with several aggressive disease characteristics including high tumour grade and FIGO stage, and for MSH6, with lymph node metastasis. In multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 remained an independent prognostic marker, also within the endometrioid low-grade subgroup (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
We demonstrate that in addition to determine MMR status, MMR protein expression levels, particularly MSH6, may add prognostic information in endometrial cancer.
“…In addition, Goodfellow et al, in a cohort of 1002 patients with EC, showed that the most common MMR defect was MLH1 loss followed by combined MSH2/MSH6 losses, then MSH6 loss alone at 70%, 20.5%, and 19.6%, respectively [ 71 ]. Several articles highlighted an increased prevalence of MSH6 mutations representing 3.8% (95% CI 1.0–9.5%) of patients with EC compared to 2.6% (95% CI 0.5–7.4%) of patients with HNPCC tumors [ 167 , 168 , 169 ]. It is, thus, essential to screen patients with EC with IHC using the four proteins.…”
The objective of this systematic review was to summarize our current knowledge of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for identifying mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors in endometrial cancer (EC). Identification of MMRd tumors, which occur in 13% to 30% of all ECs, has become critical for patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer for therapeutic management, clinical decision making, and prognosis. This review was conducted by two authors applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the following terms: “immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer”. Among 596 retrieved studies, 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were classified and presented according to their interest for the diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnostics for patients with MMRd EC. We identified 10, 18, and 96 articles using IHC expression of two, three, or four proteins of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2), respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed in 57 articles. Thirty-four articles classified MMRd tumors with IHC markers according to their prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), stage, grade, and lymph node invasion. Theragnostics were studied in eight articles underlying the important concentration of PD-L1 in MMRd EC. Even though the role of IHC has been challenged, it represents the most common, robust, and cheapest method for diagnosing MMRd tumors in EC and is a valuable tool for exploring novel biotherapies and treatment modalities.
“…In this work, we used bioinformatics and statistical tools to systematically analyze the prognostic accuracy of lncRNAs associated with mesenchymal subtype, similar to the construction of immune-related lncRNAs model (46). We integrated multiple MES-related lncRNAs into a single model and explored whether the model played a more important role in the prognostic evaluation of gliomas.…”
Glioma is well known as the most aggressive and prevalent primary malignant tumor in the central nervous system. Molecular subtypes and prognosis biomarkers remain a promising research area of gliomas. Notably, the aberrant expression of mesenchymal (MES) subtype related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is significantly associated with the prognosis of glioma patients. In this study, MES-related genes were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) data sets of glioma, and MES-related lncRNAs were acquired by performing co-expression analysis of these genes. Next, Cox regression analysis was used to establish a prognostic model, that integrated ten MES-related lncRNAs. Glioma patients in TCGA were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score; compared with the low-risk groups, patients in the high-risk group had shorter survival times. Additionally, we measured the specificity and sensitivity of our model with the ROC curve. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses showed that the prognostic model was an independent prognostic factor for glioma. To verify the predictive power of these candidate lncRNAs, the corresponding RNA-seq data were downloaded from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), and similar results were obtained. Next, we performed the immune cell infiltration profile of patients between two risk groups, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to detect functional annotation. Finally, the protective factors DGCR10 and HAR1B, and risk factor SNHG18 were selected for functional verification. Knockdown of DGCR10 and HAR1B promoted, whereas knockdown of SNHG18 inhibited the migration and invasion of gliomas. Collectively, we successfully constructed a prognostic model based on a ten MES-related lncRNAs signature, which provides a novel target for predicting the prognosis for glioma patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.