2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35502-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNAm5Cfinder: A Web-server for Predicting RNA 5-methylcytosine (m5C) Sites Based on Random Forest

Abstract: 5-methylcytosine (m5C) is a common nucleobase modification, and recent investigations have indicated its prevalence in cellular RNAs including mRNA, tRNA and rRNA. With the rapid accumulation of m5C sites data, it becomes not only feasible but also important to build an accurate model to predict m5C sites in silico. For this purpose, here, we developed a web-server named RNAm5Cfinder based on RNA sequence features and machine learning method to predict RNA m5C sites in eight tissue/cell types from mouse and hu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…thaliana, SVM again gave the highest AUC value at 0.782, which is higher than those of iRNA-m5C [26], iRNAm5C-PseDNC [20] and RNAm5CPred [23]. Two methods are available for predicting m5C sites of M. musculus, namely RNAm5Cfinder [25] and iRNA-m5C [26]. Two methods are available for detecting m5C sites of A. thaliana, namely PEA-m5C [24] and iRNA-m5C.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thaliana, SVM again gave the highest AUC value at 0.782, which is higher than those of iRNA-m5C [26], iRNAm5C-PseDNC [20] and RNAm5CPred [23]. Two methods are available for predicting m5C sites of M. musculus, namely RNAm5Cfinder [25] and iRNA-m5C [26]. Two methods are available for detecting m5C sites of A. thaliana, namely PEA-m5C [24] and iRNA-m5C.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iRNA-m5C [26], iRNAm5C-PseDNC [20] and RNAm5CPred [23]. Two methods are available for predicting m5C sites of M. musculus, namely RNAm5Cfinder [25] and iRNA-m5C [26].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Fang et al [24] mainly focused in predicting m5C sites in A. thaliana. Li et al [25] had collected data from GEO database and developed a Web server RNAm5Cfinder based on random forest algorithm, which can be used to predict m5C sites in eight kinds of cells or tissues of mouse and human. More recently, Lv et al [26] developed a server called iRNA-m5C to predict m5C sites of four types of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification algorithms were used to separate the positive samples from the negative ones in each of the four datasets {D(Sc), D(Sp), D(Kl), D(Pp)}. This study utilized five classification algorithms to evaluate their capabilities of predicting DNA replication origins, i.e., support vector machine (SVM) (Weston, et al, 2001), random forest (RF) (Jang, et al, 2018;Li, et al, 2018), multinomial naïve Bayes (MNB) classifier (Pan, et al, 2018), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) (Liang, et al, 2018;Wang, et al, 2019), and back propagation neural network (BPNN) (Rumelhart, et al, 1986).…”
Section: Classification Of Dna Replication Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%