2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNAInter v4.0: RNA interactome repository with redefined confidence scoring system and improved accessibility

Abstract: Establishing an RNA-associated interaction repository facilitates the system-level understanding of RNA functions. However, as these interactions are distributed throughout various resources, an essential prerequisite for effectively applying these data requires that they are deposited together and annotated with confidence scores. Hence, we have updated the RNA-associated interaction database RNAInter (RNA Interactome Database) to version 4.0, which is freely accessible at http://www.rnainter.org or http://ww… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each curates information on experimental data and links implicated RNA molecules to information on sequence, structure, interactions, disease associations and so on. These data are hosted at popular resources including RNAInter ( 19 ) and RNALocate ( 20 ), each reporting updates this year. Transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites are well-covered this year.…”
Section: New and Updated Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each curates information on experimental data and links implicated RNA molecules to information on sequence, structure, interactions, disease associations and so on. These data are hosted at popular resources including RNAInter ( 19 ) and RNALocate ( 20 ), each reporting updates this year. Transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites are well-covered this year.…”
Section: New and Updated Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular properties of RNAs are essential for understanding their potential phase behaviour. For each natural RNA, the description in NCBI ( 35 ), molecular function in Gene Ontology (GO) ( 40 ), subcellular localization in RNALocate ( 34 ), interaction neighbour in RNAinter ( 41 ) and associated disease in DisGeNET ( 42 ) and OMIM ( 43 ) were all integrated as RNA annotation information (Figure 1B ). Designed RNAs were divided into four subclasses based on sequence characteristics.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each LLPS experiment, a phase diagram is presented in a graphical form, if available. For the natural RNAs, which have extensive information, clicking on the RNA symbol will take the user to the RNA annotation page, which integrates RNA description ( 35 ), molecular function ( 40 ), subcellular location ( 34 ), RNA interaction network (top 100 extracted from RNAinter) ( 41 ) and associated diseases ( 42–43 ) (Figure 3D ). A detailed tutorial for the usage of the database can be found on the ‘Help’ page.…”
Section: Web Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA annotations, ncRNA SNP information and ncRNA drug-related information were added to the ViRBase v3.0. Detailed information on RNA editing sites was obtained from DARNED ( 19 ), Lncediting ( 20 ) and RADAR ( 21 ), RNA subcellular localization from RNALocate v2.0 ( 22 ), RNA modification sites from RMBase v2.0 ( 23 ), ncRNA SNP information from LincSNP v3.0 ( 24 ) and miRNASNP-v3.0 ( 25 ) and ncRNA-drug related information from ncDR ( 26 ), NoncoRNA ( 27 ), NRDTD ( 28 ) and RNAInter ( 29 ). Transcript and protein sequences from Refseq ( 30 ) and miRBase ( 31 ) databases were added to ViRBase v3.0 as a means to represent target sites predicted by miRanda ( 32 ), RIsearch ( 33 ) or PRIdictor ( 34 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ViRBase v3.0, virus and host ncRNA-associated interactions were derived from different evidence resources, such as data from experimental evidences or computational predictions. Similar to the miRTarBase and RNAInter databases ( 29 , 40 ), these data were divided into strong experimental evidence (e.g. RNA immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assay results), weak experimental evidence (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%