2017
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNAi screens for Rho GTPase regulators of cell shape and YAP/TAZ localisation in triple negative breast cancer

Abstract: In order to metastasise, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) must make dynamic changes in cell shape. The shape of all eukaryotic cells is regulated by Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (RhoGEFs), which activate Rho-family GTPases in response to mechanical and informational cues. In contrast, Rho GTPase-activating proteins (RhoGAPs) inhibit Rho GTPases. However, which RhoGEFs and RhoGAPS couple TNBC cell shape to changes in their environment is very poorly understood. Moreover, whether the activity of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our long term goal is to disentangle these signaling cascades in the context of collective cell migration. Although the roles of GEFs and their interactions with Rho GTPases are widely studied for single cell migration (Goicoechea et al, 2014;Pascual-Vargas et al, 2017), less is known how they regulate collective migration (Hidalgo-Carcedo et al, 2011;Omelchenko et al, 2014;Plutoni et al, 2016). Here, we report a comprehensive and validated, image-based GEF screen that identified differential roles of GEFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our long term goal is to disentangle these signaling cascades in the context of collective cell migration. Although the roles of GEFs and their interactions with Rho GTPases are widely studied for single cell migration (Goicoechea et al, 2014;Pascual-Vargas et al, 2017), less is known how they regulate collective migration (Hidalgo-Carcedo et al, 2011;Omelchenko et al, 2014;Plutoni et al, 2016). Here, we report a comprehensive and validated, image-based GEF screen that identified differential roles of GEFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To compare the performance of the deep-learned cell descriptors to conventional, shape-based descriptors of cell states (Bakal et al, 2007;Goodman and Carpenter, 2016;Gordonov et al, 2015;Pascual-Vargas et al, 2017;Scheeder et al, 2018;Sero and Bakal, 2017;Yin et al, 2013) we segmented phase contrast cell images of multiple cell types with diverse appearances. We used LEVER (Winter et al, 2016) for this task (Fig.…”
Section: Incorporating Temporal Information To Distinguish Between Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power of cell appearance for determining cell functional states has been the basis of decades of histopathology (Beck et al, 2011;Yuan et al, 2012) and it has also been explicitly established in predicting the state of signaling pathways that are directly implicated in the regulation of cell morphogenesis (Bakal et al, 2007;Goodman and Carpenter, 2016;Gordonov et al, 2015;Pascual-Vargas et al, 2017;Scheeder et al, 2018;Sero and Bakal, 2017;Yin et al, 2013). Other studies used deep neural networks to classify cell cycle states and diabetic retinopathy from fluorescent-labeled cells (Eulenberg et al, 2017), to predict a differentiation marker prior to the actual expression in the cells from live bright-field microscopy (Buggenthin et al, 2017;Orth et al, 2017), and to reconstruct pseudo-lineages from single cell snapshots (Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3e, f). Thus as in other cell types [33][34][35]42,60 , in LM2 cells morphology determines YAP/TAZ translocation dynamics.…”
Section: Dock5 Depletion Results In Polarity and Adhesion Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%