2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA velocity unraveled

Abstract: We perform a thorough analysis of RNA velocity methods, with a view towards understanding the suitability of the various assumptions underlying popular implementations. In addition to providing a self-contained exposition of the underlying mathematics, we undertake simulations and perform controlled experiments on biological datasets to assess workflow sensitivity to parameter choices and underlying biology. Finally, we argue for a more rigorous approach to RNA velocity, and present a framework for Markovian a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
98
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
2
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, over developmental time these assumptions are unlikely to hold across all developmental transitions, which can lead to the inference of incorrect directionality (Bergen et al 2021). Similarly, when applying RNA velocity algorithms to scRNA-seq data of a known differentiation trajectory, reversed velocities have been reported (Gorin et al 2022). For these reasons, we performed most of our trajectory inference analysis using Monocle3 (Trapnell et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, over developmental time these assumptions are unlikely to hold across all developmental transitions, which can lead to the inference of incorrect directionality (Bergen et al 2021). Similarly, when applying RNA velocity algorithms to scRNA-seq data of a known differentiation trajectory, reversed velocities have been reported (Gorin et al 2022). For these reasons, we performed most of our trajectory inference analysis using Monocle3 (Trapnell et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Another important difference between Dynamo and RNAForecaster is that Dynamo requires its input data to be smoothed using k-nearest neighbors averaging in order to compute RNA velocity (Qiu et al,2022). This procedure essentially averages the cells that are close together in expression space, which may introduce some distortions or remove important variation (Gorin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we have shown LatentVelo is accurate on many datasets, for some it requires additional hyperparameter adjustment in terms of regularization strength. Indeed, all of the RNA velocity methods we compared with also have multiple settings and hyperparameters, in addition to preprocessing steps [14]. More work needs to be done in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%