2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA snap ™: a rapid, quantitative and inexpensive, method for isolating total RNA from bacteria

Abstract: RNAsnap™ is a simple and novel method that recovers all intracellular RNA quantitatively (>99%), faster (<15 min) and less expensively (∼3 cents/sample) than any of the currently available RNA isolation methods. In fact, none of the bacterial RNA isolation methods, including the commercial kits, are effective in recovering all species of intracellular RNAs (76–5700 nt) with equal efficiency, which can lead to biased results in genome-wide studies involving microarray or RNAseq analysis. The RNAsnap™ procedure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNA was extracted from E. coli following the RNAsnap protocol for gram-negative bacteria (65). Roughly 10 8 bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 30 s, the supernatant was removed by aspiration, and pelleted cells were immediately transferred to liquid nitrogen to halt transcription.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA was extracted from E. coli following the RNAsnap protocol for gram-negative bacteria (65). Roughly 10 8 bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 30 s, the supernatant was removed by aspiration, and pelleted cells were immediately transferred to liquid nitrogen to halt transcription.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…via the RNeasy kit) short RNA species tend to become lost, whereas phenol-based reagents (e.g. TRIzol) bias against longer transcripts (Stead et al, 2012). TRIzol extraction has further been reported to deliver RNA in low yield for some bacterial species (Jahn et al, 2008).…”
Section: Defining the Minimal Materials Requirements For A Dual Rna-sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method had been optimized to recover transcripts of all sizes, including short RNA fractions (in particular miRNAs and sRNAs) in addition to larger transcripts, and in this respect may surpass traditional column-based RNA isolation techniques (Stead et al, 2012). To this end, infected cells at a given time point were trypsinized, collected and directly lysed in 600 µL of Lysis/Binding buffer of the mirVana kit (Ambion).…”
Section: Rna Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twentyfive and 3 mL samples were taken after 1 and 2 h for protein and RNA extraction, respectively. RNA was extracted by the RNAsnap procedure (Stead et al 2012). Protein extraction was performed by resuspending the cell pellet in 2× SDS buffer (100 mM TrisHCl pH 6.8, 200 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.2% bromophenol blue, and 20% glycerol) and boiling the cells for 15 min.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Expression Of Ha-tagged Ptxs And Pa5194 Varimentioning
confidence: 99%