2023
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.22843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool

Abstract: This JAMA Insights discusses RNA sequencing, which allows detection of qualitative and quantitative changes in RNA expression across the genome in clinical samples, and how it may improve molecular diagnostic rates achieved by diagnostic exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When implementing RNA-seq as an adjunct to DNA sequencing in rare disease clinical diagnostics, many factors should be considered in addition to analytical validity, including clinical validity, clinical utility, cost and turnaround time (TAT) (25). For example, we noted that the operation of the modified polyA+ method is simpler than that of the ribo-minus method, with a shorter processing time per sample by an average of 0.5 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When implementing RNA-seq as an adjunct to DNA sequencing in rare disease clinical diagnostics, many factors should be considered in addition to analytical validity, including clinical validity, clinical utility, cost and turnaround time (TAT) (25). For example, we noted that the operation of the modified polyA+ method is simpler than that of the ribo-minus method, with a shorter processing time per sample by an average of 0.5 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Among genetic diagnostic tools, RNA-seq is relatively low cost and high throughput, and is increasingly being used as an adjunct to exome sequencing. 25 The clinical use of RNA-seq to evaluate variants with uncertain pathological significance has been demonstrated in Mendelian disorders. 12 In patients with undiagnosed genetic diseases, RNA-seq has improved diagnostic yield by 7.5% to 36% through evidencing the pathogenicity of variants previously misinterpreted or missed by exome or genome sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among genetic diagnostic tools, RNA‐seq is relatively low cost and high throughput, and is increasingly being used as an adjunct to exome sequencing 25 . The clinical use of RNA‐seq to evaluate variants with uncertain pathological significance has been demonstrated in Mendelian disorders 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transcriptome is specific to tissues/organs, and some genes cannot be detected in clinically accessible tissues such as blood, skin fibroblast cells, or simple tissue samples. Therefore, only variants with splicing damage potential in a particular group of genes can be validated using RT‐PCR or RNA‐seq (Ketkar et al., 2023). Minigenes can be used to investigate splice errors in vitro but may not reflect splicing events in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%