2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA secondary structure prediction based on SHAPE data in helix regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this approach has been extensively validated and generally yields structure models with accuracies above 90% ( 44 , 46 , 51 , 52 ). Even in the case where there is not SHAPE data for the entirety of an RNA (as is common at the ends of transcripts), incorporating available SHAPE data still greatly improves the accuracy of structure predictions ( 53 , 54 ). As an internal control, we initially compared the structure models derived for the CDS regions of different transcripts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this approach has been extensively validated and generally yields structure models with accuracies above 90% ( 44 , 46 , 51 , 52 ). Even in the case where there is not SHAPE data for the entirety of an RNA (as is common at the ends of transcripts), incorporating available SHAPE data still greatly improves the accuracy of structure predictions ( 53 , 54 ). As an internal control, we initially compared the structure models derived for the CDS regions of different transcripts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHAPE probing of RNA secondary structures is similarly enhanced by integration with eCLIP. SHAPE-eCLIP could aid discovery of the structural motifs preferred by any RBP of interest (Dominguez et al, 2018;Kazan et al, 2010;Maticzka et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2018), given that RNA structure predictions are vastly improved by incorporating structure probing data (Deigan et al, 2009;Lotfi et al, 2015;Low and Weeks, 2010;Ramachandran et al, 2013). However, we note that in vivo structure probing signal is convoluted by bases that form hydrogen bonds with protein and thus appear to be base paired (with RNA) to the naive observer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These techniques have been utilized to learn the rules describing mutations that affect protein behavior, and use them to infer new relevant mutations that will be resistant to certain drugs [ 9 ]. Another use is to predict the potential secondary structure formation based on primary structure sequences [ 10 12 ]. A different direction is to predict the discovery of single nucleotide variants in RNA sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%