2014
DOI: 10.1261/rna.043323.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA secondary structure modeling at consistent high accuracy using differential SHAPE

Abstract: RNA secondary structure modeling is a challenging problem, and recent successes have raised the standards for accuracy, consistency, and tractability. Large increases in accuracy have been achieved by including data on reactivity toward chemical probes: Incorporation of 1M7 SHAPE reactivity data into an mfold-class algorithm results in median accuracies for base pair prediction that exceed 90%. However, a few RNA structures are modeled with significantly lower accuracy. Here, we show that incorporating differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The global minimum free-energy secondary structures generated with and without experimental data shared only 73% of predicted base pairs. This level of dissimilarity leads to substantial, nontrivial differences in modeled structures (35). Only 7 of the 15 regions with mutually conserved structures were present in some form in the structures predicted without use of SHAPE data (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global minimum free-energy secondary structures generated with and without experimental data shared only 73% of predicted base pairs. This level of dissimilarity leads to substantial, nontrivial differences in modeled structures (35). Only 7 of the 15 regions with mutually conserved structures were present in some form in the structures predicted without use of SHAPE data (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the resulting models have disagreed with accepted structures (Quarrier et al 2010;Kladwang et al 2011c;Hajdin et al 2013;Sükösd et al 2013;Rice et al 2014), motivating efforts to estimate uncertainty (Kladwang et al 2011c;Ramachandran et al 2013), to incorporate alternative mapping strategies (Cordero et al 2012a;Kwok et al 2013), and to integrate mapping with systematic mutagenesis (mutate-and-map [M 2 ]) (Kladwang and Das 2010;Kladwang et al 2011a,b;Cordero et al 2014). Even these improvements do not provide routes to validation through independent experiments, and structure inferences remain under question (Wenger et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been promising results on several model RNAs of known structure, including large molecules such as the 1542-nucleotide Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA (Deigan et al 2009;Hajdin et al 2013;Rice et al 2014). However, the general level of accuracy of these techniques for new RNAs has been questioned (Kladwang et al 2011c;Sukosd et al 2013;Tian et al 2014).…”
Section: Prelude: 1d Rna Chemical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, reanalysis of a model based on selective 2´-OH acylation by primer extension (SHAPE) of the 9173-nucleotide HIV-1 RNA genome (Watts et al 2009) suggested that more than half of the presented helices were not well-determined (Kladwang et al 2011c), and subsequent work, including both experimental and computational improvements, have significantly revised these uncertain regions (Pollom et al 2013;Siegfried et al 2014;Sukosd et al 2015). The debate over whether these methods produce acceptable structure accuracies continues (Deigan et al 2009;Eddy, 2014;Kladwang et al 2011c;Leonard et al 2013;Rice et al 2014;Sukosd et al 2013;Tian et al 2014) and will not be reviewed in detail here. There is general agreement, however, on some points.…”
Section: Prelude: 1d Rna Chemical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%