1968
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90352-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA replication by nuclear satellite DNA in different mouse cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Amphibian lampbrush chromosomes -first cytological evidence of satellite DNA transcription Biochemical evidence on the satellite DNA transcription 34 has required further cytological demonstration. Application of novel DNA/RNA-transcripts in situ hybridization (ISH) technique to the preparations of lampbrush chromosomes enabled the first cytological demonstration of satellite DNA transcription.…”
Section: Lampbrush Chromosomes Of Amphibians and Birds -A Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Amphibian lampbrush chromosomes -first cytological evidence of satellite DNA transcription Biochemical evidence on the satellite DNA transcription 34 has required further cytological demonstration. Application of novel DNA/RNA-transcripts in situ hybridization (ISH) technique to the preparations of lampbrush chromosomes enabled the first cytological demonstration of satellite DNA transcription.…”
Section: Lampbrush Chromosomes Of Amphibians and Birds -A Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite identification of satellite DNA transcription in mouse as early as the late 60s (Harel et al, 1968;Cohen et al, 1973), the structure of CT and PCT transcripts remains poorly characterized. Indeed, the repetitive nature of CT and PCT regions adds to the difficulty of their analysis.…”
Section: Where and When Are Ct And Pct Sequences Expressed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent evidences support the idea that the function or functions of satDNAs are not only carried out by its DNA molecule. Truly, the hypothesis of their permanent repressive status was disturbed many years ago (1960s and 1970s) when the transcription of satDNAs was firstly described (Harel et al 1968;Cohen et al 1973). Nevertheless, this fact was ignored for a long time, and only recently, with the advent of the study of ncRNAs, it was completely accepted that satDNAs are transcribed into satellite noncoding RNAs.…”
Section: Satellite Ncrnas and Their Functional Significancementioning
confidence: 97%