“…The simplicity of this code has profound implications. Based on work performed in diverse model organism ranging from plants (Arribas-Hernández et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2018) , through insects (Haussmann et al, 2016;Lence et al, 2016) to mammalian systems, m6A at different sites is thought to be recognized by diverse readers that lead to differential outcomes, with some readers leading to increased decay, others impacting translation, others impacting export from the nucleus, and additional readers are still awaiting characterization (Dominissini et al, 2012;Edupuganti et al, 2017;Frye et al, 2018;Fu et al, 2014;Gilbert et al, 2016;Meyer and Jaffrey, 2017;Wang et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2018) . In addition, diverse erasers are suggested to be at play, also potentially modulating m6A levels (Jia et al, 2011;Mauer et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2013) .…”