2018
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA Interference (RNAi) Screening inDrosophila

Abstract: In the last decade, RNA interference (RNAi), a cellular mechanism that uses RNA-guided degradation of messenger RNA transcripts, has had an important impact on identifying and characterizing gene function. First discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans, RNAi can be used to silence the expression of genes through introduction of exogenous double-stranded RNA into cells. In Drosophila, RNAi has been applied in cultured cells or in vivo to perturb the function of single genes or to systematically probe gene function … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(266 reference statements)
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these efforts, limitations of RNAi technologies are numerous and consequently advancements in this field have stagnated in recent years. High false negative rates, particularly in highly expressed genes due to insufficient small RNA expression [10,17,21], high false positive rates due to positional or off-target effects [22][23][24][25] and the difficulty of simultaneously targeting multiple genes, has limited the research capabilities of RNAi. Coexpression of Dicer2 can reduce false negative rates, but also may increase the prevalence of false positives [10,17] and further complicates the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these efforts, limitations of RNAi technologies are numerous and consequently advancements in this field have stagnated in recent years. High false negative rates, particularly in highly expressed genes due to insufficient small RNA expression [10,17,21], high false positive rates due to positional or off-target effects [22][23][24][25] and the difficulty of simultaneously targeting multiple genes, has limited the research capabilities of RNAi. Coexpression of Dicer2 can reduce false negative rates, but also may increase the prevalence of false positives [10,17] and further complicates the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOF was classically achieved in vivo in Drosophila using random mutagenesis (St Johnston 2002) and in more recent years, is achieved by knockdown using RNA interference (RNAi) (Dietzl et al 2007), or knockout using CRISPR-Cas9 (Port et al 2014). Transgenic RNAi is a powerful and straightforward method for analysis of gene function [reviews include (Perrimon et al 2010;Heigwer et al 2018)]. In Drosophila, RNAi is cell-autonomous, and is used in conjunction with the GAL4/UAS system (Brand and Perrimon 1993) for both spatial and temporal knockdown, providing a powerful approach to the study of genes with pleiotropic functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, reverse genetic approaches, such as RNA interference (RNAi), are gene-centric designed and allow to probe the function of a large number of genes (Boutros and Ahringer, 2008;Mohr et al, 2014;Heigwer et al, 2018;Horn et al, 2011). Furthermore, RNAi reagents can be genetically encoded and used to screen for gene function with spatial and temporal precision (Dietzl et al, 2007;Kaya-Çopur and Schnorrer, 2016;Ni et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, RNAi reagents can be genetically encoded and used to screen for gene function with spatial and temporal precision (Dietzl et al, 2007;Kaya-Çopur and Schnorrer, 2016;Ni et al, 2009). In recent years tissue specific-RNAi screens have provided multiple new insights into the biology of multicellular animals (reviewed in Heigwer et al, 2018). However, RNAi is often limited by incomplete penetrance due to residual gene expression and can suffer from off-target effects (Perkins et al, 2015;Echeverri et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%