2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA-interacting proteins act as site-specific repressors of ADAR2-mediated RNA editing and fluctuate upon neuronal stimulation

Abstract: RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) diversifies the transcriptome by changing adenosines to inosines. In mammals, editing levels vary in different tissues, during development, and also in pathogenic conditions. From a screen for repressors of editing we have isolated three proteins that repress ADAR2-mediated RNA editing. The three proteins RPS14, SFRS9 and DDX15 interact with RNA. Overexpression or depletion of these proteins can decrease or increase editing levels by 15%, thus allowin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
76
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, ADAR3 is specifically expressed in the brain and central nervous system (16,28) and may act as one of many brain-specific regulators of editing. Recently, several RBPs including SRFS9 and RPS14 were shown to alter editing of specific target mRNAs, and expression of these RBPs changed during embryonic development as well as upon neuronal stimulation (54). An interesting possibility is that ADAR3 expression varies during development or in specific brain regions and results in differential GRIA2 editing in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, ADAR3 is specifically expressed in the brain and central nervous system (16,28) and may act as one of many brain-specific regulators of editing. Recently, several RBPs including SRFS9 and RPS14 were shown to alter editing of specific target mRNAs, and expression of these RBPs changed during embryonic development as well as upon neuronal stimulation (54). An interesting possibility is that ADAR3 expression varies during development or in specific brain regions and results in differential GRIA2 editing in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, editing by ADARs is also regulated on the transcript level by the landscape of RNA-binding proteins present on a given mRNA. For example, the RNA-binding proteins SRFS9, RPS14, and DDX15 were shown to inhibit RNA editing of specific target mRNAs (54). Interestingly, these proteins decrease in expression during brain development in mice, and the expression levels of SFRS9 and DDX15 are altered upon neuronal stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was shown that in developing mouse neurons increased nuclear localization of ADAR2 might contribute to this phenomenon [29] together with protein modifications on ADARs and regulatory factors [30,31]. We previously showed that a gradual increase in editing is also found for filamin A, in both neuronal and non-neuronal tissues [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point we cannot exclude that ADAR2 activity on this specific transcript could be at least in part a regulated process. As there is no correlation between Flnb editing and ADAR2 expression, editing of Flnb could possibly be affected by competing RNA-binding proteins or editing regulators [24,30,31,37]. This idea is also supported by the lack of correlation of editing levels in Flna and Flnb RNAs which are both edited by ADAR2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative splicing of ADAR transcripts (Lai et al 1997;Rueter et al 1999) and post-transcriptional modification (Desterro et al 2005) have both been observed to cause decreased ADAR activity. In addition, RNA-binding proteins can both promote and repress editing of specific adenosines (Bhogal et al 2011;Tariq et al 2013;Washburn et al 2014). However, how much these mechanisms interact to determine overall editing efficiency and whether these mechanisms are active in all cell types is poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%