2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6433-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA 3D Structure Modeling by Combination of Template-Based Method ModeRNA, Template-Free Folding with SimRNA, and Refinement with QRNAS

Abstract: RNA encompasses an essential part of all known forms of life. The functions of many RNA molecules are dependent on their ability to form complex three-dimensional (3D) structures. However, experimental determination of RNA 3D structures is laborious and challenging, and therefore, the majority of known RNAs remain structurally uncharacterized. To address this problem, computational structure prediction methods were developed that either utilize information derived from known structures of other RNA molecules (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bujnicki group used a hybrid modeling strategy (Piatkowski et al 2016) based on the approach tested in the previous editions of the RNA-Puzzles experiment (Cruz et al 2012;Miao et al 2015). If the target sequence exhibited detectable similarity to an RNA with known experimentally determined structure (as happened in the case of Puzzles 4 and 8), the Bujnicki group generated models of the whole molecule or its parts using a template-based (comparative) modeling method ModeRNA (Rother et al 2011b) or its server version (Rother et al 2011a).…”
Section: Bujnicki Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bujnicki group used a hybrid modeling strategy (Piatkowski et al 2016) based on the approach tested in the previous editions of the RNA-Puzzles experiment (Cruz et al 2012;Miao et al 2015). If the target sequence exhibited detectable similarity to an RNA with known experimentally determined structure (as happened in the case of Puzzles 4 and 8), the Bujnicki group generated models of the whole molecule or its parts using a template-based (comparative) modeling method ModeRNA (Rother et al 2011b) or its server version (Rother et al 2011a).…”
Section: Bujnicki Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling of DENV-2 fNR structures was optimized through comparative RNA modeling, using ZIKV fNR crystal structure as template (5TPY). This was performed using ModeRNA software (Piatkowski et al, 2016). The local geometry in preliminary models were refined through energy minimization using the AMBER force field in the Molecular Modelling toolkit (Hinsen, 2000).…”
Section: Denv-2 Sfrna 3d Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new FARFAR2 protocol is designed to instead take input information in as simple a manner as possible into a single Rosetta executable, rna_denovo . Analogous to other RNA modeling packages (Krokhotin et al, 2015; Piatkowski et al, 2016; Popenda et al, 2012), the rna_denovo executable now accepts the RNA sequence, the RNA secondary structure in community-standard dot-parentheses notation, and, if available, the names of PDB-formatted files holding template structures of any known sub-motifs or sub-domains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, computational methods to predict 3D ncRNA structure could be of substantial value. Current computational methods for 3D ncRNA structure prediction include coarse-grained MD simulation (Vfold3D (Zhao et al, 2017); iFoldRNA (Krokhotin et al, 2015)), coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation (Rosetta FARFAR (Das and Baker, 2007) and SimRNA (Piatkowski et al, 2016)), and motif assembly (RNAComposer (Popenda et al, 2012); 3dRNA (Jian et al, 2017); MC-Fold (Parisien and Major, 2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%