2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RMSE is not enough: Guidelines to robust data-model comparisons for magnetospheric physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because modeled MPSD and CPCP were compared against multiple datasets, the lone usage of error metrics like RMSE is not enough to meaningfully rank model performance (Liemohn et al, 2021) as has often been done before (e.g., Pulkkinen et al, 2011). Because there is no single right answer, a significant aim of this study has been to develop innovative metrics to better quantify the performance of global models against multiple, divergent observationally-derived estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because modeled MPSD and CPCP were compared against multiple datasets, the lone usage of error metrics like RMSE is not enough to meaningfully rank model performance (Liemohn et al, 2021) as has often been done before (e.g., Pulkkinen et al, 2011). Because there is no single right answer, a significant aim of this study has been to develop innovative metrics to better quantify the performance of global models against multiple, divergent observationally-derived estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a rule of thumb, RMSE values less than 0.1 shows that the model can relatively predict the data accurately. Furthermore, a RMSE value of the present study (0.016) that is smaller than both standard deviation values of observed data (0.305) and predicted data (0.313) is considered good [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This coefficient is between 1 and −1 and if there is no relationship between the two variables, it is equal to zero [60]. These indicators are calculated based on the following formulas [61][62][63][64]:…”
Section: Validation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%