2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4263-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River water quality management considering agricultural return flows: application of a nonlinear two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming

Abstract: In this paper, a new fuzzy methodology is developed to optimize water and waste load allocation (WWLA) in rivers under uncertainty. An interactive two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming (ITSFP) method is utilized to handle parameter uncertainties, which are expressed as fuzzy boundary intervals. An iterative linear programming (ILP) is also used for solving the nonlinear optimization model. To accurately consider the impacts of the water and waste load allocation strategies on the river water quality, a calibr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the solution is constrained by and must adhere to quality targets [17,42,91]). The mathematical programming techniques applied in this research include linear programming [80,103,178,197], nonlinear programming [17,91,121,150,155,206], dynamic programming [138,174,241], stochastic programming [33,42,70,99,128,139,141,187,207,208,224,225,240], and quadratic programming [86,113].…”
Section: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the solution is constrained by and must adhere to quality targets [17,42,91]). The mathematical programming techniques applied in this research include linear programming [80,103,178,197], nonlinear programming [17,91,121,150,155,206], dynamic programming [138,174,241], stochastic programming [33,42,70,99,128,139,141,187,207,208,224,225,240], and quadratic programming [86,113].…”
Section: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marinoni et al [140] propose a framework for planning major investment decisions and apply this to the case of a water quality enhancement program in a river catchment in Brisbane, Australia. Compromise programming is first used to score the options [42,87,118,121,126,132,139,150,174,176,208,213,224] Storm water [17] Wastewater [1,33,65,80,86,98,106,113,129,139,141,169,187,197,206,219,238] Water allocation [172,230,233] Water trading [224] Water treatment [33,206] Wetlands [39,207,225] for pollution reduction at various sites and the optimal investment problem is then formulated as a multicriteria knapsack problem. In some cases, legislation needs to be considered alongside other management strategies.…”
Section: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liu et al [16] improved a two-stage fuzzy robust programming model for water pollution control to address fuzzy parameters, which were represented by possibility distributions on the left-and right-hand sides of the constraints. Tavakoli et al [17] developed an interactive two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming method to handle uncertainties expressed as fuzzy boundary intervals (i.e., the lowerand upper-bounds of intervals are presented as possibility distributions). Ji et al [18] enhanced an inexact left-hand-side chance-constrained fuzzy multi-objective programming approach to cope with fuzziness in the constraints and objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was applicable to problems characterized by uncertainty in unobservable parameters; meanwhile, some problems were resolved upon observation of the outcome of the first-stage decision. Tavakoli [24] proposed a nonlinear two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming to tackle uncertainties described as fuzzy boundary intervals and probability distributions in decision making of optimal water allocation and pollutant load policies. Hu et al [25] proposed a Bayesian-based two-stage inexact optimization method for supporting water pollution control under uncertainty; optimal production patterns of economic activities under different pollutant discharge allowance scenarios were generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%