2021
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology8010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River Flow Alterations Caused by Intense Anthropogenic Uses and Future Climate Variability Implications in the Balkans

Abstract: River flow alterations, caused by climate variability/change and intense anthropogenic uses (e.g., flow regulation by dams) are considered among the main global challenges of which hydrologists should be dealing with. For the purpose of this study, environmental flow and potential hydrological alterations are made for the extended Drin river basin, with limited historical hydrological information available. To overcome this limitation environmental flow assessment is made using simulated streamflow data from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the figures demonstrate a more-than-double runoff decrease when the RCP8.5 climatic scenario is applied. Research on the Drin Basin, which is in proximity with the two case study basins, validates the current outputs, since Papadaki and Dimitriou [69] concluded that the discharges trend slope expressed in percent per year equals −0.14% and −0.5% under the REMO2009 RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 simulations, respectively. In case of the E-HYPE simulations triggered by the RACMO22E model, the outputs are very similar in both rivers for the RCP4.5 scenario, i.e., runoff reduction of about 6.3% for the STF period and runoff reduction < 1.6% for the LTF period; while for the worst-case scenario (RCP8.5/LTF), the projected discharge decline is approximately 15.0% for both rivers in comparison to the REF period.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the figures demonstrate a more-than-double runoff decrease when the RCP8.5 climatic scenario is applied. Research on the Drin Basin, which is in proximity with the two case study basins, validates the current outputs, since Papadaki and Dimitriou [69] concluded that the discharges trend slope expressed in percent per year equals −0.14% and −0.5% under the REMO2009 RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 simulations, respectively. In case of the E-HYPE simulations triggered by the RACMO22E model, the outputs are very similar in both rivers for the RCP4.5 scenario, i.e., runoff reduction of about 6.3% for the STF period and runoff reduction < 1.6% for the LTF period; while for the worst-case scenario (RCP8.5/LTF), the projected discharge decline is approximately 15.0% for both rivers in comparison to the REF period.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As far as the simulations connected to the RCA4 climatic model are concerned, the discharges are projected to decrease less than 3.79% and about 12.6-17.7% for the STF and LTF periods, respectively, under the RCP4.5 scenario for both rivers. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, a doubling of the runoff decrease is foreseen between the STF and LTF periods, e.g., in the Axios River the STF simulated runoff decrease of 14.4% turns to 27.41% for the LTF period; this is an argument about the model predictions that is supported by the literature [69].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In terms of hydrological cycle "sojourn" river water turnover takes place in 16 days [21]. As a result, river flow is impacted as seen in Europe [22], in the United Kingdom [23], in the Balkans [24], in Ethiopia [25], in India [26], and in West Africa [27]. Precipitation and temperature scenarios of climate change based on atmospheric circulation play an important role [28] and so do diagnostic statistics of daily rainfall variability in an evolving climate [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além da variabilidade climática, as alterações antropogênicas no uso e cobertura do solo e as mudanças no regime hídrico encontramse entre os maiores desafios globais a serem enfrentados nos estudos hidrológicos (Garg et al, 2019;Papadaki e Dimitriou, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified