1992
DOI: 10.1086/285427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River Boundaries and Species Range Size in Amazonian Primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
325
3
24

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
325
3
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, some meandering rivers such as the Juruá and Purus appear not to have acted as primary barriers for speciation in some terra firme vertebrate taxa [50 -52]. Nevertheless, many Amazonian terrestrial vertebrate groups of the terra firme forest exhibit taxonomic disjunctions across the same rivers that separate reciprocally monophyletic lineages in Psophia, and these interfluvial areas harbour high endemicity [17,18,53]. Recent molecular phylogenies have also revealed multiple examples of disjuncts associated with major rivers [54 -58].…”
Section: Discussion (A) Testing the Refuge Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, some meandering rivers such as the Juruá and Purus appear not to have acted as primary barriers for speciation in some terra firme vertebrate taxa [50 -52]. Nevertheless, many Amazonian terrestrial vertebrate groups of the terra firme forest exhibit taxonomic disjunctions across the same rivers that separate reciprocally monophyletic lineages in Psophia, and these interfluvial areas harbour high endemicity [17,18,53]. Recent molecular phylogenies have also revealed multiple examples of disjuncts associated with major rivers [54 -58].…”
Section: Discussion (A) Testing the Refuge Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the refuge hypothesis [3], which identifies orbital forcing of climate, and consequent cyclical expansion and contraction of rainforest, as the promoter of isolation and differentiation. A second explanation proposes that tectonically mediated river dynamics [4,5] have been primarily responsible for the isolation of forest biotas. Despite these two general and often-cited hypotheses [6], it is broadly understood that, while multiple causation has been operable [7], rigorous testing of these and other alternatives has been lacking [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marcio Ayres and colleagues formulated a synthesis of the river and refugia hypotheses: the river-refuge model (Ayres & Clutton-Brock 1992). This hypothesis argues that during glaciations Amazonian forests contracted but did not fragment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By identifying current areas of endemism as the major refugia and recognizing the intertwined history of forests and rivers, this hypothesis builds on criticisms of previous models. The distribution of primates and birds has been used as evidence for the river-refuge model (Ayres & Clutton-Brock 1992;Capparella 1991;Martins et al 1988;Wallace et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is currently known that large rivers might represent important dispersal restrictions to primates, thus serving as geographical barriers between the communities on opposite margins (but see review in FERRARI 2004). Therefore, rivers might determine the distributions and promote differentiation among primate taxa (AYRES & CLUTTON-BROCK 1992, RYLANDS et al 1996, PATTON et al 2000, SILVA-JÚNIOR 2002, FERRARI 2004, VILANOVA et al 2005 In western State of Paraná (PR) and eastern State of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), in Brazil, the Upper Paraná River provides a geopolitical frontier, which coincides with the vegetational limits of the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado, and is influenced by the Pantanal wetlands (SOUZA et al 2004, ALHO & GONÇALVES 2005. Despite its ecological importance, systematic surveys of primates and other mammals of the region are scarce, except for a few isolated studies (TIEPOLO et al 2004, AGUIAR et al 2005, 2007a, b, CORTE et al 2007, CULLEN JR et al 2005, GARCIA et al 2005, LUDWIG et al 2007, ROCHA et al 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%