2017
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1700518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rivaroxaban or Aspirin for Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract: BACKGROUNDAlthough many patients with venous thromboembolism require extended treatment, it is uncertain whether it is better to use full-or lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy or aspirin. METHODSIn this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, we assigned 3396 patients with venous thromboembolism to receive either once-daily rivaroxaban (at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg) or 100 mg of aspirin. All the study patients had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy and were in equipoise regarding the need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
450
2
30

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 591 publications
(484 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
450
2
30
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with limited information on clinical factors in a claims database, we were not able to test this “reverse causation” hypothesis. Regarding major bleeding events, the non‐significant rate difference estimated from our 6‐month analysis was smaller than the rate difference reported in the EINSTEIN‐EXT trial but similar to that in the EINSTEIN‐CHOICE trial, although the level of events was higher (our study: 1.51% vs. 1.39% for the continued and discontinued cohorts, respectively; EINSTEIN‐EXT: 0.7% vs 0% in rivaroxaban and placebo cohorts, respectively; EINSTEIN‐CHOICE: 0.5% and 0.4% vs 0.3% for the 10 mg, 20 mg rivaroxaban, and aspirin cohorts, respectively) 14, 16. This may be due to a lower risk of bleeding in the population of clinical trials given their restrictive eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, with limited information on clinical factors in a claims database, we were not able to test this “reverse causation” hypothesis. Regarding major bleeding events, the non‐significant rate difference estimated from our 6‐month analysis was smaller than the rate difference reported in the EINSTEIN‐EXT trial but similar to that in the EINSTEIN‐CHOICE trial, although the level of events was higher (our study: 1.51% vs. 1.39% for the continued and discontinued cohorts, respectively; EINSTEIN‐EXT: 0.7% vs 0% in rivaroxaban and placebo cohorts, respectively; EINSTEIN‐CHOICE: 0.5% and 0.4% vs 0.3% for the 10 mg, 20 mg rivaroxaban, and aspirin cohorts, respectively) 14, 16. This may be due to a lower risk of bleeding in the population of clinical trials given their restrictive eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The relative risk reduction of recurrent VTE event at 12 months was 65% lower for those who continued treatment vs discontinued in our study. The corresponding risk reduction was 82% in EINSTEIN‐EXT (rivaroxaban vs. placebo), and about 70% in EINSTEIN‐CHOICE (rivaroxaban vs. aspirin) 14, 16, 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations