2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32341-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rituximab versus tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R4RA): 16-week outcomes of a stratified, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
125
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike in oncology, DNA analyses and biopsies of disease tissue are not readily available in the care of patients with RA because synovial biopsies outside of clinical studies are rare and DNA sequence variations provide limited actionable information in RA [ 54 56 ]. In the R4RA trial, RNA sequencing-based identification of patients with RA with a low or absent B cell lineage gene expression signature in synovial tissue significantly correlated with a superior response to tocilizumab than rituximab, thus suggesting that gene expression may be used to predict response to other targeted therapies in RA [ 57 ]. Studies of the AMPLE, AVERT, GO‐BEFORE, and GO‐FORWARD trials have used baseline disease assessments such as DAS28, RAPID3, CDAI, or SDAI to predict radiographic progression or magnetic resonance imaging-detected synovitis in response to treatment with a targeted therapy [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in oncology, DNA analyses and biopsies of disease tissue are not readily available in the care of patients with RA because synovial biopsies outside of clinical studies are rare and DNA sequence variations provide limited actionable information in RA [ 54 56 ]. In the R4RA trial, RNA sequencing-based identification of patients with RA with a low or absent B cell lineage gene expression signature in synovial tissue significantly correlated with a superior response to tocilizumab than rituximab, thus suggesting that gene expression may be used to predict response to other targeted therapies in RA [ 57 ]. Studies of the AMPLE, AVERT, GO‐BEFORE, and GO‐FORWARD trials have used baseline disease assessments such as DAS28, RAPID3, CDAI, or SDAI to predict radiographic progression or magnetic resonance imaging-detected synovitis in response to treatment with a targeted therapy [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the synovial biopsies classified as B-cell poor with RNA sequencing the TCZ group had a significantly higher response rate compared with the rituximab group for CDAI50% (rituximab group 12 (36%) of 33 patients vs TCZ group 20 (63%) of 32 patients; difference 26% (2 to 50), p=0·035). 35 Since the synovium is the ultimate target of RA, it is very likely that we could identify potential treatment biomarkers. Indeed, in the study mentioned above, in patients with RA with low or absent B-cell expression in the synovium, TCZ seems to be more effective than rituximab, a B-cell depleting agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in the first-ever biopsy-based randomised controlled trial in RA, in patients histologically classified as B-cell poor, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint (50% improvement in CDAI50% from baseline) between the rituximab-treated group and the TCZ group. However, in the synovial biopsies classified as B-cell poor with RNA sequencing the TCZ group 35 Since the synovium is the ultimate target of RA, it is very likely that we could identify potential treatment biomarkers. Indeed, in the study mentioned above, in patients with RA with low or absent B-cell expression in the synovium, TCZ seems to be more effective than rituximab, a B-cell depleting agent.…”
Section: Rheumatoid Arthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multiplicity of treatment options poses relevant questions about how to best interfere with different proinflammatory processes in individual PsA patients because clinicians lack reliable tools to select the best therapeutic pathway to target to optimize clinical response. A priori, tissue-specific biomarkers are the most promising candidates to stratify patients based on the actual ongoing pathogenic process and are suitable for targeting by pharmacological treatments, as demonstrated by some attempts in other chronic inflammatory joint diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) ( Humby et al, 2021 ). Despite important discoveries in this field, there are still great obstacles to the goal of “personalized arthritis medicine’ in the context of PsA ( Jadon et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of translating this seminal evidence into clinical practice is fascinating. In a similar condition such as RA, a recent RCT, for the first time, exploited information derived from synovial histology and mRNA expression analysis to inform selected treatment decisions ( Humby et al, 2021 ). The combination of peripheral T-cell phenotyping ( Miyagawa et al, 2018 ) with single-cell analysis at target tissue levels might also be used to inform treatment schedules in the context of PsA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%